1998
DOI: 10.1109/7.705924
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimum number of faces of a volume-scanning active array radar

Abstract: Note that the inclusion of k does not change the situation of observability analysis for target motion analysis (TMA), which is a binary parameter (it is observable or not). However, explicit approximations of the theoretical bounds for variance of estimates with and without k have been derived in the paper (see (45)-(50)) and compared with Monte-Carlo results. Furthermore, we can note that the change in the bearings is tightly related to the observer maneuver. improvements) may be very optimistic for multiple… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After coherently combining the product of measured S 21 values and the complex taper weights applied across all the spatial samples of the synthetic aperture, an inverse Fourier transform was used to generate each directional PDP by transforming the frequency domain data to the temporal domain. Note that beam-steering directions were chosen systematically based on an algorithm in [52] such that all the beams overlap at the 3-dB beamwidth. This rigorous approach accounts for the fact that the width of a scanned beam increases in proportion to the product of the cosines of the azimuth and elevation angles.…”
Section: Data Preparation and Resulting Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After coherently combining the product of measured S 21 values and the complex taper weights applied across all the spatial samples of the synthetic aperture, an inverse Fourier transform was used to generate each directional PDP by transforming the frequency domain data to the temporal domain. Note that beam-steering directions were chosen systematically based on an algorithm in [52] such that all the beams overlap at the 3-dB beamwidth. This rigorous approach accounts for the fact that the width of a scanned beam increases in proportion to the product of the cosines of the azimuth and elevation angles.…”
Section: Data Preparation and Resulting Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such cases when solving (6) is infeasible, the solution of (9) has , as explained in Section III-A. The values of and obtained by solving (8) and (9) are not always the same as those found using the equalization-based approach. In fact, in many cases, the minimax-based approach results in lower (i.e., better) values of , as will be elaborated below.…”
Section: B the Minimax-based Approachmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…For the pyramidal array, the problem is defined as (8) and for the more complicated case of the pyramidal frustum (9) Minimax optimization problems are typically solved numerically, e.g., [10]. Unlike the equalization-based approach, a feasible solution of (9) always exists for any valid coverage range.…”
Section: B the Minimax-based Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Corey [9] proposed a graphical technique to determine the optimal face tilt of a single array for a given scan requirement. The approaches in [8] and [9] and subsequent results, e.g., [10] and [4], are based on equalizing the maximum off-axis scan angles of all of the arrays, referred to below as the equalization-based approach. The optimal face elevation of pyramidal frusta given a general hemispherical coverage requirement has not been addressed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%