1987
DOI: 10.1007/bf00274716
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimum prediction of three-way crosses from single crosses in forage maize (Zea mays L.)

Abstract: Three-way cross means were predicted with formulae involving linear functions of general (GCA) and specific combining ability (SCA) effects estimated from single-cross factorials between genetically divergent populations. Data from an experiment with 66 single-cross and 66 three-way cross forage maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids was used for comparing the prediction formulae. The genotypic correlation (r) between observed and predicted three-way crosses increased with increasing χ, the weighting factor of SCA effect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
32
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
3
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) was investigated by Bernardo (1996) to predict performance of untested single crosses using phenotypic information of related single crosses and genetic relationships among their parental inbred lines. The GCA estimates of parental lines provide an established and simple approach to predict hybrid performance (Melchinger et al 1987). In this study, GCA based prediction of 28 9 28 maize inbred lines crosses was performed to predict single-cross performance for MLN resistance and GY.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) was investigated by Bernardo (1996) to predict performance of untested single crosses using phenotypic information of related single crosses and genetic relationships among their parental inbred lines. The GCA estimates of parental lines provide an established and simple approach to predict hybrid performance (Melchinger et al 1987). In this study, GCA based prediction of 28 9 28 maize inbred lines crosses was performed to predict single-cross performance for MLN resistance and GY.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the Hessian matrix (see appendix b) of F pp1;pp2 at the critical point is positive definite (due to positive eigenvalues), its determinant, detðH ðF pp1;pp2 ÞÞ, is also positive. Thus, F pp1;pp2 has a local minimum at (0, 0) (Price 1984 (Melchinger et al 1987). With predominance of s 2 GCA over s 2 SCA , early testing becomes more effective and superior hybrids can be identified and selected mainly on the basis of their prediction from GCA effects.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An increased divergence between two populations of a heterotic pattern increases the probability to complementary select for favorable alleles at different loci. Melchinger et al, (1987) emphasized the importance of the variances due to general (σ 2 GCA) and specific combining ability (σ 2 SCA) and their ratio for predicting hybrid performance. MELCHINGER and GUMBER (1998) recommended the following criteria for the identification of new patterns: (i) high mean performance and large genetic variance in the hybrid population; (ii) high per se performance and good adaptation of the parent populations to the target environment; and (iii) low inbreeding depression, if hybrids are produced from inbreds.…”
Section: Advantages and Disadvantages Of Heterotic Groups And Heterotmentioning
confidence: 99%