Optimum tuning of Tuned Mass Dampers for frame structures under earthquake excitation

Abstract

Summary Tuned Mass Damper (TMD) devices are one of the oldest vibration control means and are widely used in different engineering contexts. Despite the bulk of literature on various TMD‐related issues, the effectiveness of TMDs in reducing the earthquake response of civil engineering structures is still debated. This paper deals with the optimum tuning of the free parameters of a passive TMD applied to sample frame structures subjected to selected seismic excitations. A tuning procedure consisting of a numerical Minimax optimization algorithm is implemented within MATLAB. The so‐conceived TMD turns out to be optimum with respect to the specific seismic event, hence allowing for optimum reduction in primary seismic response. Both optimization process and seismic analysis are carried out in the time domain, through direct integration of the equations of motion. The method is tested on benchmark single‐DOF and multi‐DOF shear‐type prototype structures from the literature by assuming first the Imperial Valley 1940 seismic input, as a sort of benchmark excitation, and then additional recent strong motion earthquakes. In essence, this paper shows that, in principle, with present reference to frame structures, the optimum tuning of TMD parameters at given seismic input is theoretically possible. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Earthquake Protection of Existing Structures with Limited Seismic Joint: Base Isolation with Supplemental Damping versus Rotational Inertia

“…e optimization procedure here proposed resembles tuning procedures for TMD-based control strategies [10,20,27,44], wherein some parameters are the free design variables sought in the optimization problem, while other parameters are supposed known. e TMDI is characterized by four parameters in the most general case, namely, μ t , β t , ω t , and ζ t .…”

Seismic FDD modal identification and monitoring of building properties from real strong-motion structural response signals

“…The identification of structural dynamic properties at seismic input pursues various goals, as response prediction, condition assessment, Structural Control and Health Monitoring, or damage identification. () Nearly all of the available attempts towards these ends pertain to the realm of Experimental Modal Analysis (EMA),() since they need the knowledge or measurement of the input ground motion. However, in most practical cases, the true foundation input motion turns out to be unavailable or unreliable (e.g., not recorded, recorded with low signal‐to‐noise ratio, or affected by soil‐structure interaction (SSI) effects()).…”

Multi-objective optimal design of tuned mass dampers

“…It was shown to be very efficient in reducing the response to a narrow band of loading frequencies in such systems as well. Indeed, many works extended the optimal design problem of TMDs to MDOF systems (see, e.g., these studies). Some works, however, found that a single TMD was less efficient in reducing the responses of MDOFs to a broadband input such as earthquakes .…”