2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2006.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimum X-plate dampers for seismic response control of piping systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As part of the seismic response and dynamic characteristics verification of a steel structure with DFMDs, shaking table tests were conducted on a steel structure with DFMDs under four earthquake ground motion records. It was also confirmed that placement of such X-plate dampers affects the response of buildings in a study by Pujari and Bakre [64]. As compared to the other placement schemes considered, it was reported that the optimal placement of the damoers resulted in a greater reduction of response.…”
Section: Steel Plate Damperssupporting
confidence: 59%
“…As part of the seismic response and dynamic characteristics verification of a steel structure with DFMDs, shaking table tests were conducted on a steel structure with DFMDs under four earthquake ground motion records. It was also confirmed that placement of such X-plate dampers affects the response of buildings in a study by Pujari and Bakre [64]. As compared to the other placement schemes considered, it was reported that the optimal placement of the damoers resulted in a greater reduction of response.…”
Section: Steel Plate Damperssupporting
confidence: 59%
“…The aim behind the use of X-shape of damper is it will have a constant strain variationover its height, thus ensuring that yielding occur simultaneously and uniformly over the full height of the damper. XPDs allow it to behave nonlinearly but restrict behavior of the structure up to the linear elastic range.A series of experimental tests were conducted at Bhabha Atomic Research Center (BARC) and IIT Bombay to study the behavior of these XPDs by and Bakre et al (2006) also studied the behavior of XPDs and observed the subsequent results (i) it exhibits smoothly nonlinear hysteretic loops under plastic deformation; (ii) it can sustain a large number of yielding reversals; (iii) there is no significant stiffness or strength degradation and (iv) it can accurately modeled by Wen's hysteretic model or as a bilinear elasto-plastic material. A typical XPD with holding device used in the present work as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Mechanism Of Xpd In Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…2. Typical XPD with holding devices (Bakre et. al., 2006) Using beam theory the properties of XPD are evaluated using the following equations:…”
Section: Mechanism Of Xpd In Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fujita et al [20] performed a seismic response analysis on piping systems with non-linear support by using a differential algebraic equation and analyzed the effects of the device based on this result. Bakre et al [21,22] established a relevant piping numerical model based on the results of the shake table tests of a piping system that used a sliding friction damper and x-plate damper carried out in 1995 at Tsukuba NIED, Japan, and analyzed these devices' effects on the seismic performance of piping system. Jia et al [23] developed a new type of damper applicable to piping systems and verified it experimentally.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%