OPTIMUS: Self-Adaptive Differential Evolution with Ensemble of Mutation Strategies for Grasshopper Algorithmic Modeling

Abstract

Most of the architectural design problems are basically real-parameter optimization problems. So, any type of evolutionary and swarm algorithms can be used in this field. However, there is a little attention on using optimization methods within the computer aided design (CAD) programs. In this paper, we present Optimus, which is a new optimization tool for grasshopper algorithmic modeling in Rhinoceros CAD software. Optimus implements self-adaptive differential evolution algorithm with ensemble of mutation strategies (jEDE). We made an experiment using standard test problems in the literature and some of the test problems proposed in IEEE CEC 2005. We reported minimum, maximum, average, standard deviations and number of function evaluations of five replications for each function. Experimental results on the benchmark suite showed that Optimus (jEDE) outperforms other optimization tools, namely Galapagos (genetic algorithm), SilverEye (particle swarm optimization), and Opossum (RbfOpt) by finding better results for 19 out of 20 problems. For only one function, Galapagos presented slightly better result than Optimus. Ultimately, we presented an architectural design problem and compared the tools for testing Optimus in the design domain. We reported minimum, maximum, average and number of function evaluations of one replication for each tool. Galapagos and Silvereye presented infeasible results, whereas Optimus and Opossum found feasible solutions. However, Optimus discovered a much better fitness result than Opossum. As a conclusion, we discuss advantages and limitations of Optimus in comparison to other tools. The target audience of this paper is frequent users of parametric design modelling e.g., architects, engineers, designers. The main contribution of this paper is summarized as follows. Optimus showed that near-optimal solutions of architectural design problems can be improved by testing different types of algorithms with respect to no-free lunch theorem. Moreover, Optimus facilitates implementing different type of algorithms due to its modular system.

Optimal Design of a Canopy Using Parametric Structural Design and a Genetic Algorithm

“…Finally, when the existence of the best solution and thus best (or sub-optimal) reference performance values are known, a termination criterion should be defined. Otherwise, the algorithm can be stopped manually until a satisfactory solution is obtained [38,39]. Heuristic evolutionary solvers are used when optimization problems have many variables, and an optimal solution cannot be found through exact solvers.…”

Engineering Origami: A Comprehensive Review of Recent Applications, Design Methods, and Tools

“…[212] Kangaroo and Crane are built inside Grasshopper, and can therefore be combined with several tailored optimization components. Single-objective optimization tools such as Galapagos, [213] Silvereye, [214] and Optimus, [215] and multiobjective optimization tools such as Octopus, [216] Opossum, [217] and Wallacei [218] can be coupled with Kangaroo and Crane to generate novel optimization workflows. Recent studies investigated the feasibility of such tools showing promising results.…”

Self-learning Buildings: integrating Artificial Intelligence to create a building that can adapt to future challenges

“…Parametric Design allows us to create a parameter-based system that generates forms and structures with such complexity that it would not have been possible for these forms to be imagined or sketched by pen and paper without these tools [24]. AI Software like Grasshopper Scripting gives the architect the ability to use geometric component-based programming with complex algorithms to generate design variations that follow a specific design vocabulary and offer many options [25]. It is almost like an architect's own programming language.…”