2014 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/smc.2014.6974232
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Option and constraint generation using Work Domain Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The agent should avoid taking those actions defined as constraints. RL methods are used to generate policies for how an algorithm should make a decision or play a game in terms of an agent interacting with an environment (Tokadlı & Feigh, 2014;Mohan & Laird, 2010).…”
Section: Reinforcement Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The agent should avoid taking those actions defined as constraints. RL methods are used to generate policies for how an algorithm should make a decision or play a game in terms of an agent interacting with an environment (Tokadlı & Feigh, 2014;Mohan & Laird, 2010).…”
Section: Reinforcement Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent work by Tokadlı and Feigh (2014) has investigated using the Abstraction Hierarchy modeling from Work Domain Analysis as an additional complementary method to elicit domain knowledge for use in machine learning algorithms. In that study, the authors used the results of AHs and translated the players' domain knowledge into options and constraints.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations