Credit Risk Frontiers 2011
DOI: 10.1002/9781118531839.ch8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Options on Credit Default Swaps and Credit Default Indexes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the following, we use the notation of Rutkowski (2012). Let T0<T1<<Tm ${T}_{0}\lt {T}_{1}\lt \text{\unicode{x022EF}}\lt {T}_{m}$ denote the tenor structure of a forward‐start CDIS, where T0=T ${T}_{0}=T$ is the inception date, Tm ${T}_{m}$ is the maturity date and Tj ${T}_{j}$ is the j $j$th fee payment date for j=1,,m $j=1,\text{\unicode{x02026}},m$.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the following, we use the notation of Rutkowski (2012). Let T0<T1<<Tm ${T}_{0}\lt {T}_{1}\lt \text{\unicode{x022EF}}\lt {T}_{m}$ denote the tenor structure of a forward‐start CDIS, where T0=T ${T}_{0}=T$ is the inception date, Tm ${T}_{m}$ is the maturity date and Tj ${T}_{j}$ is the j $j$th fee payment date for j=1,,m $j=1,\text{\unicode{x02026}},m$.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, randomness in PVTMathClass-open(κMathClass-close) $P{V}_{T}(\kappa )$ vanishes and PVTMathClass-open(κUMathClass-close) $P{V}_{T}({\kappa }_{U})$ remains to be random with respect to κT ${\kappa }_{T}$ only. We can rewrite the swaption payoff in Equation (1) to (STn(κ)+LT)+=(STa(κ))+, ${(}^{{S}_{T}^{n}(\kappa )+{L}_{T}}={(}^{{S}_{T}^{a}(\kappa )},$ where STaMathClass-open(κMathClass-close)=STnMathClass-open(κMathClass-close)+LT ${S}_{T}^{a}(\kappa )={S}_{T}^{n}(\kappa )+{L}_{T}$ denotes the loss‐adjusted forward CDIS and we have used the approximation PVTMathClass-open(κMathClass-close)nPVTMathClass-open(κTMathClass-close)JTATn $P{V}_{T}(\kappa )n\approx P{V}_{T}({\kappa }_{T}){J}_{T}\approx {A}_{T}^{n}$ (see Section 8.5.3 in Rutkowski, 2012). The price of the loss‐adjusted forward CDIS at time tMathClass-open[0,TMathClass-close] $t\in [0,T]$ is given by StaMathClass-open(κMathClass-close)=double-struckEtdouble-struckQ(Pta)κdouble-struckEtdouble-struckQ(A...…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the following, we use the notation of Rutkowski (2012). Let T 0 < T 1 < · · · < T m denote the tenor structure of a forward-start CDIS, where…”
Section: Credit Default Index Swaptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…t (κ) = E Q t (P n t ) − κE Q t (A n t ), 4Morini and Brigo (2011) refer to the default of all entities as the Armageddon event, whereas Rutkowski (2012) uses the term collapse event. The authors have shown that incorporating the event requires knowledge of the risk-neutral conditional distribution of τ n Rutkowski (2012). is silent on its estimation, whileMorini and Brigo (2011) resort to index tranches.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%