2022
DOI: 10.1101/2022.06.25.497592
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optogenetic reduction of theta oscillations reveals that a single reliable time cell sequence is not required for working memory

Abstract: In a delayed alternation spatial working memory task, hippocampal time cells fire during specific moments of the delay period to form a stable, sequential representation of the entire delay interval. The causal relationship between these sequences and working memory remains unclear. Similarly, hippocampal theta oscillations are thought to support working memory, primarily through the generation of time cell sequences. To causally examine these relationships, we optogenetically silenced the medial septal GABAer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 54 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A major motivation for examining splitters is that it is an access point into internally generated activity during encoding, because all sensory cues at the time are identical. Time cells are similar to splitter cells in the sense that they show a large internally generated component, especially when sensory input is ‘clamped’ by running on a treadmill ( Kraus et al, 2013 ; MacDonald et al, 2011 ; Pastalkova et al, 2008 ; Yong et al, 2022 ). Note that "Flickering" between multiple maps or reference frames ( Jackson and Redish, 2007 ; Jezek et al, 2011 ; Kelemen and Fenton, 2010 ) and theta sequences ( Foster and Wilson, 2007 ; Skaggs et al, 1996 ) similarly are not sensory-driven.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A major motivation for examining splitters is that it is an access point into internally generated activity during encoding, because all sensory cues at the time are identical. Time cells are similar to splitter cells in the sense that they show a large internally generated component, especially when sensory input is ‘clamped’ by running on a treadmill ( Kraus et al, 2013 ; MacDonald et al, 2011 ; Pastalkova et al, 2008 ; Yong et al, 2022 ). Note that "Flickering" between multiple maps or reference frames ( Jackson and Redish, 2007 ; Jezek et al, 2011 ; Kelemen and Fenton, 2010 ) and theta sequences ( Foster and Wilson, 2007 ; Skaggs et al, 1996 ) similarly are not sensory-driven.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%