2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymben.2018.12.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

OptSSeq explores enzyme expression and function landscapes to maximize isobutanol production rate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
34
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
2
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lysis and digestion were performed as previously described (Ghosh et al, 2019). Briefly, the cell pellets were first re-suspended in 1 mL 6 M guanidine hydrochloride (GnHCl) to lyse the cells and precipitate the protein, MeOH was added to 90% final concentration.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lysis and digestion were performed as previously described (Ghosh et al, 2019). Briefly, the cell pellets were first re-suspended in 1 mL 6 M guanidine hydrochloride (GnHCl) to lyse the cells and precipitate the protein, MeOH was added to 90% final concentration.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Atsumi et al engineered E. coli to produce isobutanol up to 22 g/L in shake flasks [33,42], which was further increased to 50 g/L in bioreactors during batch cultures with in situ product removal by gas stripping [43]. Recently, Ghosh and co-workers optimized their constructs based on models to predict the impacts of enzyme synthesis cost on cellular growth rates and obtained a recombinant strain with an isobutanol productivity of 3 g/h/g DCW (dry ell weight) [44]. Li and co-workers found that B. subtilis was a feasible host because it had a higher isobutanol tolerance than E. coli and C. glutamicum and produced up to 2.62 g/L isobutanol during fed-batch fermentation [36].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite of significant progress achieved on isobutanol production in various microorganisms, most require aerobic fermentation conditions, a costly input for industrial production. In addition, current efforts on improving isobutanol production in these microorganisms have been focused on increasing the pyruvate pool, eliminating by-product formation, and maintaining redox balance [44,[47][48][49][50][51]. For example, the Entner-Doudoroff (ED) pathway was applied into E. coli, and the ED pathway-dependent isobutanol-producing E. coli strain was further optimized to produce 15.0 g/L isobutanol after byproduct biosynthesis genes were inactivated [52].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting E. coli strain, ED02, produced 13.67 g/L isobutanol with a productivity of 0.456 g/L/h, a 56.8 and 88.1% improvement over the parent strain, respectively. Ghosh et al (2019) used the Optimization by Selection and Sequencing (OptSSeq) strategy to regulate expression levels of genes in the isobutanol synthetic pathway. They found that the optimum levels of pathway enzymes (AlsS, IlvC, IlvD, Kivd, and AdhA) were a molar ratio of 2.5:6.7:2:1:5.2, which led to 3 g/h/gDCW of isobutanol production.…”
Section: C3-c4 Alcohol Tolerance and Production In E Colimentioning
confidence: 99%