2017
DOI: 10.5603/ait.2017.0005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optymalizacja funkcji układu krążenia w okresie okołooperacyjnym u chorych poddawanych operacjom niekardiochirurgicznym — stanowisko Sekcji Kardiotorakoanestezjologii Polskiego Towarzystwa Anestezjologii i Intensywnej Terapii. Część 1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

5
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Goal-directed therapy is effective only if adequate methods of hemodynamic monitoring are applied [ 59 ]. These methods should be adjusted to individual patient’s needs and possible contraindications, taking into account preoperative risk of complications, the type and extent of surgery [ 60 ]. Treatment protocols use dynamic parameters (typically stroke volume variation or pulse pressure variation) to verify fluid responsiveness and stroke volume changes (ΔSV) to assess heart function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Goal-directed therapy is effective only if adequate methods of hemodynamic monitoring are applied [ 59 ]. These methods should be adjusted to individual patient’s needs and possible contraindications, taking into account preoperative risk of complications, the type and extent of surgery [ 60 ]. Treatment protocols use dynamic parameters (typically stroke volume variation or pulse pressure variation) to verify fluid responsiveness and stroke volume changes (ΔSV) to assess heart function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blood pressure (BP) is routinely monitored during anesthesia giving insight into organ perfusion in a safe, non-invasive way [1,2]. It also allows to implement goal-directed hemodynamic therapy, including proper fluid regimen and catecholamines [2,3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 29 ] This discrepancy may result from the type of study (PPS vs cohort) or the fact that peri-operative risk assessment is performed in some hospitals with different methods. We decided to use tools which were the simplest possible but reliable, which is in line with national recommendations [ 14 ] and makes our findings comparable worldwide. Moreover, our analysis did not include an intra-operative assessment of fluid loss, particularly blood loss, which could affect the total fluid dose transfused.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The patients’ individual pre-operative risk was assessed using ASA-PS classification, [ 13 ] according to the guidelines of the Cardiac and Thoracic Anesthesia Section of the Polish Society of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy. [ 14 , 15 ] ASA-PS III+ subjects covered the high risk group. Surgical procedures were classified as low, intermediate, and high risk, according to the guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Society of Anesthesiology.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%