Treatment of mice with the combination of clarithromycin with rifampin resulted in a significantly lower number of Rhodococcus equi CFU in the organs of mice than treatment with either drug alone or placebo. There was no significant difference in the number of R. equi CFU between mice treated with clarithromycin monotherapy, rifampin monotherapy, or placebo. The combination of clarithromycin with rifampin conferred a clear advantage over either drug as monotherapy in this model of chronic R. equi infection.
Rhodococcus equi, a Gram-positive facultative intracellular pathogen, is one of the most important causes of disease in foals between 3 weeks and 5 months of age. R. equi has also emerged as a common opportunistic pathogen in immunocompromised people, especially those infected with HIV (1-3). Infection in both foals and people is most commonly characterized by life-threatening pyogranulomatous pneumonia, but extrapulmonary infections are also common (3,4).Although a wide variety of antimicrobial agents are active in vitro against R. equi (5, 6), many of these drugs are reported to be ineffective in vivo, presumably because of poor cellular uptake and the resulting low intracellular concentrations (7). The combination of a macrolide, such as erythromycin, clarithromycin (CLR), or azithromycin, with rifampin (RIF), the mainstay of therapy in foals infected with R. equi (8-10), is also used commonly for the treatment of infections caused by R. equi in people (3). The combination of a macrolide and RIF is synergistic in vitro (11,12), and the use of the 2 classes of drugs in combination reduces the likelihood of resistance to either drug developing in R. equi (13). CLR is often selected over other macrolides because of its greater in vitro activity against R. equi (6) and because a retrospective study in foals suggests that, in combination therapy with RIF, CLR is more effective than other macrolides (8). However, in both people and foals, concurrent administration of RIF considerably reduces CLR concentrations compared to concentrations achieved with CLR monotherapy (14-16). This has raised the question of whether administration of RIF in addition to CLR is necessary, or even advisable, for the treatment of infections caused by R. equi. The objective of this study was to compare the in vivo activity of CLR and RIF alone and in combination in a mouse model of R. equi infection.The virulent R. equi strain 103ϩ was used for infection of mice based on its documented ability to replicate in macrophages and in immunodeficient mice (17,18). The MICs of CLR and RIF were determined by broth macrodilution, as described previously (13), in accordance with the guidelines established by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (19).The animal efficacy studies were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Georgia. Six-to 8-week-old male athymic nude (nu/nu) mice (Harlan Laboratories, Inc., Indianapolis, IN, USA) were used in an R. equi infection model. In this model system, virul...