ObjectivesThis study was conducted to examine urban–rural differences in the real-world prescribing pattern of oral anticoagulants and geographic variations in the prescribing pattern among clinicians serving Medicare beneficiaries in the USA.DesignA cross-sectional study.SettingA real-world setting.Participants232 665 clinicians who prescribed oral anticoagulants for Medicare beneficiaries from the 2020 Medicare Provider Utilisation and Payment Data were classified as warfarin only, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) only or warfarin+DOAC prescribers.Main outcome measuresUrban–rural differences in the prescribing patterns were examined using multivariate multinominal logistic regression analysis. A geospatial analysis was conducted to estimate standardised prescriber ratios (SPR) for DOAC only or warfarin only prescribers versus warfarin+DOAC prescribers to illustrate hot and cold spots for DOAC adoption in the USA.Results92% of clinicians who prescribed oral anticoagulants prescribed DOAC in 2020. Clinicians from rural regions were more likely to prescribe warfarin only (adjusted OR=1.335, 95% CI=(1.281 to 1.391)) and DOAC only (adjusted OR=2.052, 95% CI=(1.999 to 2.106)), compared with clinicians from urban regions. Hot spots for SPR of DOAC only versus warfarin+DOAC prescribers were mostly found in California, southern and southeastern states; cold spots were mostly found in Minnesota and Iowa. Hot spots for SPR of warfarin only versus warfarin+DOAC prescribers were mostly found in several metropolitan areas on the west coast and in Midwest; cold spots were mostly found on the east coast.ConclusionsUrban–rural status of clinicians was associated with their prescribing patterns of oral anticoagulants. The study identifies geographical heterogeneity in DOAC adoption and highlights gaps that may need to be addressed for increased accessibility of DOAC for patients in need.
