2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.2004.tb02748.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oral Cancer Knowledge and Examination Experiences Among North Carolina Adults

Abstract: Although there is moderate knowledge of signs and risk factors for oral cancer among North Carolina adults, knowledge deficits remain. Oral cancer examinations need to be increased, particularly among tobacco smokers.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

12
64
2
8

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
12
64
2
8
Order By: Relevance
“…48 However, the results of this survey are consistent with previously published data on HNC awareness and awareness of specific head and neck subsites. [16][17][18][19][20]23 These results are also comparable to data from the analogous 2003 survey conducted by telephone, indicating that the methods used are reliable. Finally, because knowledge of definitions of HNC among respondents was very low, it is likely that "head and neck cancer" was an unfamiliar term for most respondents.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…48 However, the results of this survey are consistent with previously published data on HNC awareness and awareness of specific head and neck subsites. [16][17][18][19][20]23 These results are also comparable to data from the analogous 2003 survey conducted by telephone, indicating that the methods used are reliable. Finally, because knowledge of definitions of HNC among respondents was very low, it is likely that "head and neck cancer" was an unfamiliar term for most respondents.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…These results were consistent as observed in earlier studies (Patton et al, 2004;Elango et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The post intervention results showed a significant improvement in the knowledge of the respondents as the mean value obtained was fairly high. Similar studies conducted elsewhere also showed the same results, but there was a dropping-out of the participants from their studies and also the authors had not taken significant steps to avoid interference of any extraneous event which may have given false positive results (Patton et al, 2004;Sankaranarayanan et al, 2006;Elango et al, 2009). Unlike the current study which had a short duration of time between the pre and post intervention, Stefano Petti and Crispian Scully (2007) conducted a study on knowledge and awareness of oral cancer with a long-term gap (one year) and reported a similar result (Petti and Scully, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%