1989
DOI: 10.1016/0168-0102(89)90021-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oral cavity representation at the frontal operculum of macaque monkeys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
36
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is yet little evidence for these additional representations of teeth and tongue, except from Krubitzer et al (1995). However, neurons activated by tapping the teeth have been reported for the head portion of area VS and for a small portion of cortex caudal to S2 in owl monkeys (Cusick et al, 1989; for related observations on macaque monkeys, see also Ogawa et al, 1989;Ito and Ogawa, 1994).…”
Section: Et Al 2001mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is yet little evidence for these additional representations of teeth and tongue, except from Krubitzer et al (1995). However, neurons activated by tapping the teeth have been reported for the head portion of area VS and for a small portion of cortex caudal to S2 in owl monkeys (Cusick et al, 1989; for related observations on macaque monkeys, see also Ogawa et al, 1989;Ito and Ogawa, 1994).…”
Section: Et Al 2001mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In part, this may reflect a peculiarity of the gustatory system, as the small percentage of taste-specific neurons in gustatory cortex of rats increased as qualifying criteria were broadened (Katz et al, 2001). Yet even neurons responsive to touch on the tongue appear to be rare and scattered over a large region of cortex in the lateral sulcus (Ogawa et al, 1989;Ito and Ogawa, 1994). A possible interpretation of such results is that the region of G in macaques and perhaps other primates is not a single area, but rather recordings have been from a number of adjoining and nearby areas, each with a portion devoted to processing tactile and/or taste information from the tongue, while much of each area is devoted to other sensory inputs from other parts of the mouth, face, and body, or from other modalities such as temperature or pain.…”
Section: What About Area G and Orbitofrontal Taste Cortex?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Convergent responses to laryngeal and tongue stimulation were obtained in the same region, anterior to S1, so the authors viewed this region as motor cortex (O'Brien et al 1971). However, others have regarded the inferior precentral cortex as area 3 extending anterior and lateral from the tip of the central sulcus and providing either the sensory representation of the ipsilateral intraoral region (Manger et al 1996) or a taste-related region Ogawa et al 1985Ogawa et al , 1989Pritchard et al 1986). Thus the possibility remains that the vagal potential site in monkey sensorimotor cortex is also located in area 3a.…”
Section: Comparison With Prior Vagal-evoked Potential Studies In Othementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also in that study, the tongue representation was likely to receive an additive projection from the lateral surface of the frontal operculum near the lateral sulcus, although the investigators did not particularly emphasize this. This region may presumably correspond to the precentral extension of area 3, which was also implicated in gustatory function [22,23].…”
Section: Representation Of Orofacial Structures In Area 3bmentioning
confidence: 99%