The late 1950s and early 1960s witnessed a dramatic change in the practice of medicine. At this time many drugs were introduced into the clinic which for the first time allowed the effective treatment of many common diseases such as hypertension, angina pectoris, depression, schizophrenia, carcinomas and leukaemias to name only a few. Right from the beginning of modern drug therapy, it was observed that there was substantial variability among patients both in therapeutic efficacy and the occurrence of side-effects. The realization that dose was a poor predictor of therapeutic response raised the curiosity of clinicians and pharmacologists in elucidating the mechanisms responsible. This was the starting point for the development of clinical pharmacology. Of great importance for clinical pharmacology was the work carried out by the groups of R. T. Williams at St Mary's Hospital and B. B. Brodie in the Laboratory of Chemical Pharmacology at the NIH who pioneered the work on drug metabolism. The discovery of drug-metabolizing enzymes and realizing that their activity determined the rate at which drugs were eliminated from the body was instrumental for our understanding of why patients respond differently to the same dose of a drug. In a number of elegant studies, B. B. Brodie and coworkers showed that species differences in the duration of hexobarbitone action after administration of the same dose were not due to differences in sensitivity but a consequence of pronounced species differences in the rate of biotransformation of hexobarbitone. Moreover, he showed that the blood concentration at the time of awakening was very similar among the various species and in man. It is still worth reading his famous Toral Sollmann Award lecture Of Mice, Microsomes and Man at the ASPET Meeting (August 13, 1963). In this lecture, many principles that can account for variability in drug response between animals and humans were put forward. The concept that drug effects are not related to the dose administered but rather the plasma concentration achieved, and that in analogy to species differences, patient-to-patient variability in response can be explained by different plasma concentrations, was instrumental for clinical pharmacology.Rather than giving a detailed account on the progress being made, I would like to focus on Alasdair Breckenridge's contribution to the field of drug metabolism. It is in the area of drug metabolism and especially in understanding the various factors that could affect the activity of drug-metabolizing enzymes where Alasdair Breckenridge has made substantial contributions to clinical pharmacology throughout his professional career. His interest was not restricted to the experimental findings but to explore the consequences of his results for drug action and side-effects in patients. It is a persistent feature of his work that observation of a clinical problem led him to carry out experimental work to understand the mechanisms responsible and then to test the hypothesis generated in his laboratory experi...