1995
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.164.2.7840011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oral contrast material for fluoroscopic diagnosis of esophageal rupture.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the literature supporting this stems from case series of esophageal perforations from all aetiologies that have seldom included pneumatic dilation. Miss rates of esophageal perforation with water soluble contrast esophagrams have been reported to range from0-50% [8][9][10][11]. The "gold standard" in these series varied from barium esophagrams, computed tomography (CT) and esophagogastroscopy.Nonetheless, barium esophagram have also been reported to miss rates of up to 10% [12].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the literature supporting this stems from case series of esophageal perforations from all aetiologies that have seldom included pneumatic dilation. Miss rates of esophageal perforation with water soluble contrast esophagrams have been reported to range from0-50% [8][9][10][11]. The "gold standard" in these series varied from barium esophagrams, computed tomography (CT) and esophagogastroscopy.Nonetheless, barium esophagram have also been reported to miss rates of up to 10% [12].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%