Oral corrective feedback in English as a foreign language classrooms: A teaching and learning perspective

Ha, Xuan Van; Nguyen, Loc Tan; Hung, Bui Phu

doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07550

Cited by 48 publications

(35 citation statements)

References 48 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…For instance, students made errors in phrase order, grammatical structures, and logical order. It is essential for students how they made errors and how to finalize their errors (Ha et al, 2021).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

English Teachers’ Feedback on Students’ Writing Work in the New Normal Era

Fadli¹,

Irawan²,

Haerazi³

2022

JOLLS. Lang. Liter. Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Feedback is information from the teacher to the students regarding to the students’ error in learning process, and the purpose of feedback given by the teacher could improve students’ abilities in learning. In learning writing, feedback from the teacher is needed by the students to improve their writing skills. Writing is a complex process, arranging several words into a sentence and arranging several sentences into a paragraph is not an easy thing to do. In addition, in writing a sentence, the correct words are needed so that the reader can easily understand the intent written by the author. Thus, this study aims to find out what types of feedback given by the teacher to students in this new normal era, and what types of feedback can improve students' writing skills. This research used qualitative descriptive research. For data collection, researcher used the interview notes, study document, and observation. This study took two English teachers and eight students. In this study, the researcher interviewed English teachers and students regarding the feedback the teacher gave during this new normal era. The researcher found that the teachers used two types of feedback i.e. oral and written feedback in correcting students' writing assignments. In addition, the researcher found that all students experienced improvement after they were given feedback by the teacher. Most students’ perception about feedback given by the teachers, oral feedback is very effective and can improve their writing quality.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

English Teachers’ Feedback on Students’ Writing Work in the New Normal Era

Fadli¹,

Irawan²,

Haerazi³

2022

JOLLS. Lang. Liter. Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The learners" L2 speaking anxiety was significantly reduced after the implementation of the two strategies as was evident in the mean score of their post-test, which was considerably higher than that of their pre-test. This improvement in their speaking performance could be attributed to the fact that they were more confident in their ability to communicate in L2 working under the selective error correction classroom (Ha et al, 2021) since the approach meets the learners" need for non-threatening correction. When implementing selective error correction, a teacher doesn"t interrupt the learners" speech flow, allowing them the opportunity to complete their thoughts.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Reducing Efl Learners’ Speaking Anxiety Through Selective Error Correction and Group-Work Strategies

Zulfikar

2022

ELT Echo

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This quantitative study aimed to examine the level of speaking anxiety experienced by second-year high-school Acehnese EFL learners in their oral performance in L2 classroom and to investigate the attempt to lower their anxiety through the implementation of selective error correction and group work. The Foreign Language Speaking Anxiety Scale (Horwitz et al., 1986) was used as a means to survey and evaluate the learners" speaking anxiety, and their oral performance was assessed through speaking performance rubric before and after the learners" exposure to selective error correction and group work. The findings showed that a high level of speaking anxiety was found in the majority of the learners, and that the use of selective error correction and group work for the treatment of speaking anxiety overall resulted in the learners" improved performance in their oral task. The findings highlighted the needs to create a positive and supportive educational environment that stimulates learners to freely experiment with L2 and to establish close-knit learning communities that promote authentic interactions in L2 and provide opportunities to be more engaged in oral language use.

show abstract

“…Due to the low slope limit during modification, many points in the network cannot be reached. As shown in Figure 4, it is not necessary to calculate the appropriate frame spacing for the diamond layer mesh content [13]. In addition, it is not necessary to keep the matrix parallelism of all the frames and the matrix components, because only three networks of the previous line are used in the calculation counts for each network point in each row.…”

Section: Dynamic Time Warping (Dtw) Recognition Algorithmmentioning

confidence: 99%

An Auxiliary Teaching System for Spoken English Based on Speech Recognition Technology

Bao

2022

Scientific Programming

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Because the English language has always been inaccurate and seemed difficult to correct errors, this development has created a reputation based on improvements to the DWJ algorithm and HMM speech scores and correction mistake. In this paper, different signal characteristics are used using the DWJ algorithm: the Mel frequency cepstrum coefficient compares the standard speech library and the distance between the speech sample and the sample message received. The conversation deciphered the Viterbi code according to the HMM model, which was recognized and evaluated by posteriori probabilities. Finally, the professional data were used to fix the wrong phone to determine, score, and make repair mistakes. The results of the experiments show that the tests used in this article are reliable. The results of the experiment show that the standard English language proficiency in this article is reliable, which can provide students with timely, accurate, and objective assessment and teaching feedback, improving English language proficiency.

show abstract

Oral corrective feedback in English as a foreign language classrooms: A teaching and learning perspective

Cited by 48 publications

References 48 publications

English Teachers’ Feedback on Students’ Writing Work in the New Normal Era

English Teachers’ Feedback on Students’ Writing Work in the New Normal Era

Reducing Efl Learners’ Speaking Anxiety Through Selective Error Correction and Group-Work Strategies

An Auxiliary Teaching System for Spoken English Based on Speech Recognition Technology

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About