2009
DOI: 10.1016/s1590-8658(09)60007-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oral Cyclosporin vs Infliximab in Patients With Severe Ulcerative Colitis Refractory to Iv Steroids. Preliminary Data of a Controlled, Randomized Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent study (currently published as an abstract only) showed that patients receiving infliximab showed a trend towards greater clinical remission, compared to oral cyclosporine, but experienced more serious opportunistic infections. 31 There is also a suggestion that i.v. cyclosporine treatment may be more appropriate for immunomodulator-naïve patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent study (currently published as an abstract only) showed that patients receiving infliximab showed a trend towards greater clinical remission, compared to oral cyclosporine, but experienced more serious opportunistic infections. 31 There is also a suggestion that i.v. cyclosporine treatment may be more appropriate for immunomodulator-naïve patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ninety-seven citations that were not included in the four systematic reviews were assessed for full-text eligibility. Fifteen of them were included, [66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80] of which 6 studies included less than 30 patients. [66][67][68][69][70][71] Nine studies that included 706 patients [72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80] were added to the 20 studies that included 1490 patients, extracted from the four meta-analyses.…”
Section: Acute Uc In Population-based Studies (Figure 1)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four studies were conference abstracts. 50,51,67,69 The mean age of patients included in population-based studies was 49 ± 5 vs. 37 ± 4 in referral centre-based studies.…”
Section: Acute Uc In Population-based Studies (Figure 1)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 421 patients were included in the analysis for this network meta-analysis. The characteristics and outcomes of the included studies [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] are summarized in Tables 1 and S1. Seven studies were conducted among adult subjects, and one study did not mention the age of patients.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%