2019
DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2019.34.96.19873
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oral disorders related to acromegaly

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The development of the midface, including the sella turcica and teeth, may be modified by disrupting signaling pathways due to mutations in the homeobox genes [ 7 ]. Moreover, glandular anomalies may be associated with functional disorders, e.g., altered hormonal levels, thus influencing dental development [ 8 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of the midface, including the sella turcica and teeth, may be modified by disrupting signaling pathways due to mutations in the homeobox genes [ 7 ]. Moreover, glandular anomalies may be associated with functional disorders, e.g., altered hormonal levels, thus influencing dental development [ 8 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One study described mild to moderate gingival ‘enlargement’ in 8 acromegalic patients out of 11 examined ( 8 ) but it was not reported if this term means thick gingival biotype or gingival hypertrophy and if periodontitis was associated. In the same way, although there is preclinical evidence of a trophic role of acromegaly on cementum ( 25 ) and two published cases reports mentioning radiological hypercementosis on molars of acromegalic patients ( 12 , 13 ), systematic orthopantomogram revealed only two cases of hypercementosis, each affecting only one tooth per patient. Hypercementosis could result from local factors such as a chronic periapical infection, lack of function due to unopposed teeth and trauma from abnormal dental occlusion ( 26 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…A total score below 80 points, that is, 66% is considered as a clinically significant impact of acromegaly on patients' quality of life. This score can be divided into three dimensions: Physical Symptoms subscale (i.e., Items 1,3,9,[13][14][15]19, and 22), Appearance Issues subscale (i.e., Items 2,4,7,11,12,16,and 17), and Personal Relation Issues subscale ( Items 5,6,8,10,18,20 and 21). As for the global score, results for each dimension were scored on a 0 to 100 basis.…”
Section: Study Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation