2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2015.11.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oral Feeding Reduces Hospitalizations Compared with Gastrostomy Feeding in Infants and Children Who Aspirate

Abstract: Objective To compare the frequency of hospitalization rates between aspirating patients treated with gastrostomy versus those fed oral thickened liquids. Study design A retrospective review was performed of patients with an abnormal videofluoroscopic swallow study between February 2006 and August 2013. 114 patients at Boston Children's Hospital were included. Frequency, length, and type of hospitalizations within one year of abnormal swallow study or gastrostomy tube placement were analyzed using a negative … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
27
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
4
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Even with enteral feeding, gastro‐oesophageal reflux and difficulties swallowing saliva could still be associated with aspiration. However, our findings are consistent with previous observations where patients with mixed diagnoses who underwent gastrostomy for risk of aspiration experienced more hospital admissions than those with similar risk who were fed orally . A larger proportion of individuals who were unable to walk were also more likely to be fed enterally and have day‐to‐day respiratory symptoms, indicative of greater clinical severity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Even with enteral feeding, gastro‐oesophageal reflux and difficulties swallowing saliva could still be associated with aspiration. However, our findings are consistent with previous observations where patients with mixed diagnoses who underwent gastrostomy for risk of aspiration experienced more hospital admissions than those with similar risk who were fed orally . A larger proportion of individuals who were unable to walk were also more likely to be fed enterally and have day‐to‐day respiratory symptoms, indicative of greater clinical severity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…However, our findings are consistent with previous observations where patients with mixed diagnoses who underwent gastrostomy for risk of aspiration experienced more hospital admissions than those with similar risk who were fed orally. 20 A larger proportion of individuals who were unable to walk were also more likely to be fed enterally and have day-to-day respiratory symptoms, indicative of greater clinical severity. Our data indicated a sixfold greater risk for hospital admission for LRTI in those unable to walk compared with those who walked independently, with being able to walk with assistance associated with intermediate risk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With prior literature of patients undergoing either a fundoplication or GJ placement suggesting that anti-reflux procedures may have minimal/no impact on subsequent respiratory related admissions (because the pulmonary complications in the majority of aspirating children are not a result of gastroesophageal reflux but instead because of a lack of thickening of oral feeds or aspiration of saliva), in turn, it makes sense that abnormal swallowing, or aspiration on a swallow study, should not preclude the placement or use of a gastrostomy tube; in fact, one could argue that for oropharyngeal dysphagia, an enteral tube is not even indicated anymore based on prior published data. 9,22,23 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…40 Enteral tube presence was chosen because of our prior study showing that tube placement increases risk of hospitalization in aspirating patients. 41 Results are presented as effect sizes and 95% CI around the difference in the effect size metric. Statistical analysis was conducted with SAS statistical software (version 9.4, SAS).…”
Section: Key Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%