2018
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-018-5485-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oral health knowledge, attitudes and care practices of people with diabetes: a systematic review

Abstract: BackgroundPeople with uncontrolled diabetes are at greater risk for several oral health problems, particularly periodontal (gum) disease. Periodontal disease also impacts diabetes control. Good oral hygiene and regular dental visits are recommended to prevent and manage oral health problems. Several studies have been conducted to assess the oral health knowledge, attitudes, and practices of people with diabetes yet a review of these findings has not yet been undertaken. The aim of this systematic review was to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
146
1
7

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(166 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
12
146
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Persons with diabetes generally have limited knowledge of oral health and no appreciation of its role in general health and diabetes management [120], coupled with poorer home oral hygiene [120], especially in hemodialysis patients [121].…”
Section: Oral Health Care and Awarenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Persons with diabetes generally have limited knowledge of oral health and no appreciation of its role in general health and diabetes management [120], coupled with poorer home oral hygiene [120], especially in hemodialysis patients [121].…”
Section: Oral Health Care and Awarenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The JBI-ACSSA tool was chosen as it is appropriate for the study design of included quantitative studies [64,90]. The assigning score for the quality of the data was performed as 1 point for each applicable item with a score of 7 as the maximum score [74]. An overall score was calculated for each included study and the rating of quality was judged as good (6/7 and 7/7), fair (3/7 to 5/7) or poor (< 3/7) [35] (see Appendix 3).…”
Section: Quality Assessment Of the Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other limitations could be that even though all included studies used the same design (cross-sectional design), the questionnaires that were used to conduct surveys in this particular area were different and some studies did not state which questionnaire was used or failed to provide information regarding the validity of the tools. Therefore, it was difficult to directly compare studies and the reliability of these included studies in this review could be compromised [74,90]. In the quality analysis, 15 of the 36 included studies were judged to be only fair quality (see Appendix 3).…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The systematic review undertaken also has limitations. There is also the possibility of outcome reporting bias 15 . Thus, the aim of the present study was to investigate the impact of oral problems on the quality of life of individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus in a population-based study conducted in northeastern Brazil.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%