Oral health–related quality of life in patients treated with fixed, removable, and complete dentures 1 month and 6 to 12 months after treatment

John, M.; Slade, GD; Szentpétery, A; Setz, J

doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.02.013

Cited by 131 publications

(210 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

183

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…There are some limitations with the use of a removable partial denture due to the supporting structures. A claspretained RPD, a low-cost rehabilitation, can contribute to the restoration of some oral functions lost after tooth loss, and studies have shown that such treatment often leads to an improvement in OHRQoL [16]. Arabi et al [17] found that the effects of prosthodontic interventions on patient perception seem to last for at least 2 years, including in a group treated with a RPD.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Arabi et al [17] found that the effects of prosthodontic interventions on patient perception seem to last for at least 2 years, including in a group treated with a RPD. While better quality of life results have been obtained with fixed dentures, additional studies are required to evaluate the effect of conventional fixed and removable dentures in a global context [16,17]. Little data is available from randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) of treatment options.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, although OHRQoL is expected to be an important outcome of prosthodontics therapy, cross-sectional and longitudinal data, according to John et al [16], is available mainly for patients treated with complete dentures or implant-supported overdentures, such as in the studies of Allen et al [19] and Heydecke et al [20]. Furthermore, evaluation of masticatory performance and quality of life together can contribute to improved choice of treatment and positively influence the prognosis.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Does a mandibular RDP and new maxillary CD improve masticatory efficiency and quality of life in patients with a mandibular Kennedy class I arch?

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives To evaluate the change in masticatory efficiency and quality of life of patients treated with mandibular Kennedy class I removable partial dentures (RPDs) and maxillary complete dentures at the Department of Dentistry of the Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte. Materials and methods A total of 33 Kennedy class I patients were rehabilitated with maxillary complete dentures, and mandibular RPDs were selected for this non-randomized prospective intervention study. The patients had a mean age of 59.1 years. Masticatory efficiency was evaluated by colorimetric assay using fuchsin capsules. The measurements were conducted at baseline and 2 and 6 months after prosthesis insertion. Quality of life was evaluated using the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) at baseline and 6 months after denture insertion. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov normality test was applied. Masticatory efficiency was evaluated by repeated measures ANOVA. Oral health-related quality of life was compared using the paired t test.Results There was no statistically significant difference in masticatory efficiency after denture insertion (p =0.101). Significant differences were found (p=0.010) for oral healthrelated quality of life. A significant improvement in psychological discomfort (p<0.01) and psychological disability (p<0.01) was observed. Mean difference value (95 % confidence interval) was 6.8 (3.8 to 9.7) points, reflecting a low impact of oral health on quality of life, considering the 0-56 range of variation of the OHIP-14 and a Cohen's d of 1.13. Conclusion According to the results of the present study, rehabilitation with Kennedy class I RPDs and complete dentures did not influence masticatory efficiency but improved oral health-related quality of life. Clinical relevance The association between the patient's quality of life and the masticatory efficiency is important for treatment predictability.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Does a mandibular RDP and new maxillary CD improve masticatory efficiency and quality of life in patients with a mandibular Kennedy class I arch?

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…9 More recently, studies using validated quality of life measures have assessed the impact of new prostheses on the oral health related quality of life (OHQoL) of edentate patients. [10][11][12][13][14][15] Most studies have com pared outcomes from implant retained mandibular overden tures against conventional complete dentures. Non-randomised studies have reported improved OHQoL for participants who received new conventional complete dentures.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Non-randomised studies have reported improved OHQoL for participants who received new conventional complete dentures. 11,14 In all these studies the dentures were provided in a den tal hospital rather than a domiciliary setting. Housebound patients are likely to be older and denture problems will be greatest in frail older people, whose ability to adapt to new dentures may be compromised by grossly resorbed ridges, lack of neuromuscular control, reduced mucosal tolerance, xerosto mia and negative affects such as loneliness, irritability, bore dom, anger and helplessness.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The effect of a domiciliary denture service on oral health related quality of life: a randomised controlled trial

et al. 2007

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Evaluation and comparison of patient satisfaction with VertexThermosens and conventional acrylic complete dentures

Alidema,

Halili

2024

Clinical & Exp Dental Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectivesPatient perception and satisfaction with dentures are important indicators in prosthodontic treatment. This study aimed to compare patients' satisfaction with VertexThermosens dentures versus conventional acrylic dentures during a 12‐month study period.Material and MethodsThis randomized study involved 60 participants aged between 45 and 80 with representation of both sexes. The patients were divided into two groups: The first group (experimental group), which had complete dentures from VertexThermosens base material included 30 participants. The second group (control group), which had complete dentures from convectional rigid acrylic base material, included 30 participants. Patient satisfaction with the dentures was assessed in each of the two Vertex/Acrylic groups through a specially created questionnaire of five questions with a five‐point Likert scale of possible answers (0 = never; 1 = rarely; 2 = occasionally; 3 = often; and 4 = very often).ResultsAfter 12 months, intergroup comparison with Mann–Whitney U Test related to Q2 (p = 0.193), Q3 (p = 0.960), Q4 (p = 0.317), Q5 (p = 1.000) patient satisfactions indicated that there was no significant difference between the two groups (Vertex/Acrylic), except Q1 (p = 0.010) question, Vertex group was more satisfied. The results regarding the patients of both groups (Vertex/Acrylic) showed that after 12 months of wearing the denture, the satisfaction level regarding to all questions increased, except Q5‐question for Vertex group, where the difference was not significant due to the already achieved maximum satisfaction at zero time.ConclusionBased on the findings of this clinical study, it can be concluded that higher satisfaction is seen in patients rehabilitated with VertexThermosens dentures than with conventional rigid acrylic dentures.

show abstract

Oral health–related quality of life in patients treated with fixed, removable, and complete dentures 1 month and 6 to 12 months after treatment

Cited by 131 publications

References 0 publications

Does a mandibular RDP and new maxillary CD improve masticatory efficiency and quality of life in patients with a mandibular Kennedy class I arch?

Does a mandibular RDP and new maxillary CD improve masticatory efficiency and quality of life in patients with a mandibular Kennedy class I arch?

The effect of a domiciliary denture service on oral health related quality of life: a randomised controlled trial

Evaluation and comparison of patient satisfaction with VertexThermosens and conventional acrylic complete dentures

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About