Oral Health Status of Individuals with Cleft Lip, Cleft Palate or Both in a Nigerian Population

Fadeyibi, IO; Sorunke, Modupeore Ekua; Onigbinde, Olubunmi O; Ogunbanjo, Victor Olabode; Ogunbanjo, B O; Ademiluyi, S. A.

doi:10.3889/mjms.1857-5773.2011.0175

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Fifteen studies were conducted in European populations, 3,4,6,8,11,12,15,17,18,20,[25][26][27]31 thirteen from Asia, 2,7,14,19,[21][22][23][24]32,33 five from South America, 1,16,28,30,35 two from North America, 5,29 one from Africa 39 and three studies do not mention the country. 9,10,40 The age range varied from 0 to 49 years old, and the studies addressed a wide 1,3,5,6,12,15,17,[26][27][28][29]35 or a narrow 4,7,8,11,14,16,…”

Section: Ta B L E 3 (Continued)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Are there any solutions for improving the cleft area hygiene in patients with cleft lip and palate? A systematic review

Rodrigues

Fernandes

Monteiro

et al. 2019

Int J Dental Hygiene

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective Children with cleft lip and palate (CLP) present high incidence of oral health problems, namely those associated with the accumulation of dental plaque. The objective of this systematic review was to verify if there is any solution to improve the hygiene of the cleft area. Materials and methods A structured systematic review was performed based on articles published in several electronic databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and Scopus in the last 20 years. The MeSH terms used were cleft lip, palate, harelip, oral hygiene and toothbrush. Results From 270 potentially relevant articles, 39 articles were selected, corresponding to a total of 3226 CLP patients and 914 matched controls. The selected studies exhibited great heterogeneity regarding the type of the study, study population (average range 0 ‐49 years old; sampling sizes 15‐400 CLP patients), evaluation periods, reported variables and oral hygiene routines. Consensual outcomes were the presence of high plaque indexes, high prevalence of dental caries and worse oral hygiene patterns in CLP patients. Additionally, poor education in oral health and low motivation to integrate regular hygiene routines in the daily family life were also evident. Conclusion There is a clear need to improve the oral hygiene care of CLP children, but few studies were focused on specific preventive approaches. Development of devices especially designed to the hygiene of the cleft area and implementation of standardized prevention and control programmes targeting education, motivation and compliance would contribute to improve oral health in CLP children.

show abstract