This paper explores the contrasts and complementarities of two different sets of archived data, life history interviews and diaries. Both are well-tried methods of data collection in the social sciences, but little attention has been given to ways of using them in combination. We begin with an outline of how we went about collecting data for archiving: recruiting 12 families, interviewing people aged 75 and over, and collecting diaries from other family members. We go onto present examples of the data from one particular family. We then compare what the interviews and diaries, analysed in combination, contributed to our understanding of time, concluding with comments on the relevance of different temporalities to current debates on family and intergenerational relationships. The archived data offer researchers interested in qualitative longitudinal investigations a complex and many-faceted understanding of temporality.
IntroductionAs part of Timescapes -a major UK qualitative longitudinal study that is generating data for archiving and reuse -the oldest generation (TOG) project has been concerned with life processes within, and associated with, families and the consequences of these for TOG. Our research questions are directed at establishing how continuities and changes in inter-generational relationships and identities are experienced and commemorated, and how families manage and account for time in the context of such change and ageing processes. The information gathered is serendipitous in that events and circumstances coincide, often with unanticipated consequences. Through symbolic and literal references, this can reveal how and why certain family relationships are sustained or change, and with what possible outcomes for care and support between the generations.The archived TOG data take three forms, interviews, diaries and photographs, each generating specific temporalities that have shed light on processes and experiences of change. In this paper, we consider how the interview and diary data contribute to the project's outcomes. Elsewhere (Bytheway & Bornat, 2012), we discuss the contribution of photographs to the project.