Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Background This study aimed to investigate the knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) toward oral health management among orthodontic patients. Methods A cross-sectional study on orthodontic patients was conducted at Suzhou Dushu Lake Hospital from December 20, 2023, to March 19, 2024. Demographic data and KAP scores were collected using self-designed questionnaires. The cutoff for adequate KAP dimension scores was 70%. Results The study included 418 orthodontic patients, of whom 274 (65.55%) were female, and 144 (34.45%) were male. The average age was 32.70 ± 8.47 years (33.72 ± 8.46 in females and 32.17 ± 8.44 in males). The mean knowledge, attitude, and practice scores were 11.80 ± 4.06 (possible range: 0–16), 27.00 ± 3.18 (possible range: 6–30), and 31.13 ± 6.01 (possible range: 8–40), respectively. The proportions of participants who scored above a cutoff of 70% were 247 (59.09%) for knowledge, 403 (96.41%) for attitude, and 290 (69.38%) for practice. Multivariate logistic regression showed that knowledge score (OR = 1.243, 95% CI: [1.152–1.342], P < 0.001), attitude score (OR = 1.255, 95% CI: [1.140–1.381], P < 0.001), and wearing an appliance for 3 to 6 months (OR = 4.309, 95% CI: [1.565–11.861], P = 0.005) were independently linked to proactive practice. Structural equation modeling demonstrated that knowledge directly influenced attitude (β = 0.684, P < 0.001) and practice (β = 0.527, P < 0.001), while attitude had a direct impact on practice (β = 0.587, P < 0.001). Conclusions The majority of orthodontic patients demonstrated adequate knowledge, positive attitudes, and proactive practices toward oral health management. Nonetheless, continuous education is still essential for certain groups, such as recently fitted orthodontic patients, to ensure sustained improvement in oral health outcomes. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12903-024-05292-5.
Background This study aimed to investigate the knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) toward oral health management among orthodontic patients. Methods A cross-sectional study on orthodontic patients was conducted at Suzhou Dushu Lake Hospital from December 20, 2023, to March 19, 2024. Demographic data and KAP scores were collected using self-designed questionnaires. The cutoff for adequate KAP dimension scores was 70%. Results The study included 418 orthodontic patients, of whom 274 (65.55%) were female, and 144 (34.45%) were male. The average age was 32.70 ± 8.47 years (33.72 ± 8.46 in females and 32.17 ± 8.44 in males). The mean knowledge, attitude, and practice scores were 11.80 ± 4.06 (possible range: 0–16), 27.00 ± 3.18 (possible range: 6–30), and 31.13 ± 6.01 (possible range: 8–40), respectively. The proportions of participants who scored above a cutoff of 70% were 247 (59.09%) for knowledge, 403 (96.41%) for attitude, and 290 (69.38%) for practice. Multivariate logistic regression showed that knowledge score (OR = 1.243, 95% CI: [1.152–1.342], P < 0.001), attitude score (OR = 1.255, 95% CI: [1.140–1.381], P < 0.001), and wearing an appliance for 3 to 6 months (OR = 4.309, 95% CI: [1.565–11.861], P = 0.005) were independently linked to proactive practice. Structural equation modeling demonstrated that knowledge directly influenced attitude (β = 0.684, P < 0.001) and practice (β = 0.527, P < 0.001), while attitude had a direct impact on practice (β = 0.587, P < 0.001). Conclusions The majority of orthodontic patients demonstrated adequate knowledge, positive attitudes, and proactive practices toward oral health management. Nonetheless, continuous education is still essential for certain groups, such as recently fitted orthodontic patients, to ensure sustained improvement in oral health outcomes. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12903-024-05292-5.
OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the relationship between orthodontic treatment, oral hygiene practices, and periodontal health in individuals undergoing or completed orthodontic treatment. MATERIALS AND METHOD: Systemically healthy patients undergoing or completed stable orthodontic treatment were included in the study. The periodontal status of 142 participants was determined using a comprehensive oral hygiene questionnaire and clinical oral examinations to assess various periodontal indices. Chi-square and t-tests were used for statistical analyses to compare periodontal status metrics between groups. RESULTS: Statistical analyses revealed no significant differences between oral hygiene habits, periodontal indices, or periodontal status between the ongoing treatment (OT) and post-orthodontic treatment (PT) groups (p>0.05). However, significant differences were noted in attachment level, dental visit frequency, and reasons for visits between the OT and PT groups (p<0.05). While participants generally showed similar oral hygiene awareness and practices, differences arose in toothbrushing times during orthodontic treatment and adherence to orthodontist recommendations. CONCLUSION: This study investigated the effect of OT on oral health and concluded that OT did not change oral hygiene habits but affected attachment levels. Orthodontists should consistently guide patients on oral hygiene and managing clinical attachment loss. In these cases, the patient should be referred to a periodontist when necessary.
Aim: To investigate the perception of dental caries risk and prevention among patients undergoing orthodontic treatment and to assess the influence of the oral hygiene information attained during orthodontic visits on patients’ perception of dental caries prevention. Methods: A cross-sectional questionnaire gathered information from 207 orthodontic patients (aged 18 and older). The questionnaire included questions about patients’ demographics, perception of dental caries risk and prevention during orthodontic treatment, and oral hygiene information received in orthodontic visits. Frequency distributions of responses were evaluated. Chi-square test was used to assess the differences in patients’ perception of dental caries prevention by demographics, and the oral hygiene information received during orthodontic appointments. Results: 74.9% of orthodontic patients perceived to be responsible for dental caries during orthodontic treatment, and 30.4% of patients perceived that it is abnormal to develop dental caries during treatment. Patients receiving information about tooth brushing methods and oral hygiene accessories during orthodontic appointments had a better perception of appropriate oral hygiene in preventing dental caries (P= 0.01 and P= 0.04, respectively). Moreover, patients receiving dietary information during orthodontic appointments had a better perception of supporting a good diet and avoiding sweets in preventing dental caries (P< 0.001 and P= 0.02, respectively). Conclusion: There is a need to improve orthodontic patients’ perception of their risk of dental caries during orthodontic treatment and the manners that would help to avoid new decay lesions. Orthodontists should not underestimate the value of providing and reinforcing oral hygiene instructions throughout the course of orthodontic treatment.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.