@ERSpublications Efficient IPF drug development is needed to ensure unmet medical need isn't overshadowed by scientific/financial risk http://ow.ly/K0aEvDespite the recent success of the nintedanib and pirfenidone programmes [1,2], idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) remains a high-risk disease area for drug development. There are no adequate preclinical models in which to test potential compounds, and no established early clinical development pathway on which to make quick decisions regarding potential efficacy [3]. The historical approach in IPF of moving compounds directly from phase 1 safety and tolerability studies into large phase 2 studies with clinical end-points required major commitments from sponsors and research subjects. Now, with effective therapies reducing the frequency and responsiveness of clinical end-points, sponsors may decide that IPF is too costly a disease to invest in.IPF needs a more efficient and informative early clinical development pathway. The innovative study by WILKES et al. [4], published in this issue of the European Respiratory Journal, describing the phase 1 results of oral immunotherapy with type V collagen in patients with IPF illustrates one such approach. This study is worth careful consideration, both for the novelty of its potential therapy and for the approach it takes to three core study design issues.
Issue 1: which mechanism to targetMost therapies under clinical development for the treatment of IPF target collagen production, the most salient (but also the most terminal) event in IPF pathobiology [5]. Less attention has been given to upstream events, and for good reason as the aetiology of IPF appears complex and heterogeneous, and knowing where to focus one's efforts has been a major challenge.