1985
DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.1985.34.992
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oral Infection and Transmission of La Crosse Virus by an Enzootic Strain of Aedes Triseriatus Feeding on Chipmunks with a Range of Viremia Levels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…taeniorhynchus infected intrathoracically had a significantly higher mean saliva titer than those exposed via an artificial blood meal or viremic animal. Although mosquitoes can be less susceptible to infection using artificial blood meals compared with natural infection, [6][7][8]29 our study found no difference in the dissemination rates observed after oral infection using the 2 methods, although there was a a 10-fold difference in the infectious dose.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…taeniorhynchus infected intrathoracically had a significantly higher mean saliva titer than those exposed via an artificial blood meal or viremic animal. Although mosquitoes can be less susceptible to infection using artificial blood meals compared with natural infection, [6][7][8]29 our study found no difference in the dissemination rates observed after oral infection using the 2 methods, although there was a a 10-fold difference in the infectious dose.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…Oral infection via artificial blood meals or viremic animals more closely resembles natural exposure. Several studies have demonstrated that mosquitoes are less susceptible to infection by artificial than by natural blood meals [6][7][8] due to the concentration of virus adjacent to the midgut epithelium that follows natural but not artificial blood meals. 9 In contrast, one study of Aedes aegypti mosquitoes infected with Semliki Forest virus found no difference in virus titers in infected mosquitoes after artificial versus natural blood meals except during the first 24 hours, and transmission did not differ significantly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We found that the difference in infectivity of MAYV was approximately five times greater when mosquitoes were fed on a viremic animal rather than an artificial blood meal, a difference that has been recognized to various degrees in previous studies. [41][42][43][44] The threshold of oral infection of Ae. aegypti with MAYV is estimated to be between 5.0 and 5.5 log 10 PFU/mL, with 0-24% of mosquitoes becoming infected at artificial blood meal doses ranging from 5.1 to 5.6 log 10 PFU/mL.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies indicated that larval stress, primarily caused by food limitation within habi tats, not only produced small adults, but adversely affected larval survival, developmental rates, and adult fitness (62,70,73,110). For example, in some laboratory studies, smaller females (which reflects reduced larval food availability) were more competent vectors for arboviruses than larger females (60,68,115). An understanding of the spatial and temporal distribution of the dietary resources available to larval mosquitoes in their natural habitats could clarify the relationships among food availability, vector competence, and" mosquito fitness.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%