2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.03.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oral intercourse or secondary transfer? A Bayesian approach of salivary amylase and foreign DNA findings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The presence of saliva on its own does not indicate cunnilingus occurred due to the potential of indirect transfer of the fluid. The same can be said for low‐level DNA transfer (<11 alleles), as sporadic alleles from background populations has been seen in other research and DNA transfer due to indirect transfer has been highlighted to take place .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The presence of saliva on its own does not indicate cunnilingus occurred due to the potential of indirect transfer of the fluid. The same can be said for low‐level DNA transfer (<11 alleles), as sporadic alleles from background populations has been seen in other research and DNA transfer due to indirect transfer has been highlighted to take place .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Indirect transfer of salivary-a-amylase has been shown to be possible. It has been observed in other research where 5.8% of males were positive for salivary-a-amylase in the inside-front of their underwear which was unconnected with engaging in oral intercourse (27). Saliva has also been transferred to the chest area by talking, coughing and sneezing, as was found by Rushton et al (28).…”
mentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Features or factors to consider Examples of evaluations at this level in the hierarchy [11,[19][20][21] [ 6,8,19,[22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] [ [30][31][32] [4, [33][34][35] [18]…”
Section: Level In the Hierarchymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies on the effectiveness of Phadebas® paper as a presumptive screening tool for saliva are limited and require additional evaluation [3,11,[23][24][25][26][27]. Detailed knowledge of the limitations of Phadebas® paper is crucial for the correct interpretation and inclusion of test results into forensic investigations.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The forensic significance of saliva is often understated, yet the primary source of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) evidence recovered from volume crime scenes as reported in the United Kingdom arises from saliva, typically located on peripheral items such as drinking vessels and cigarette ends [2]. Furthermore, establishing the nature of, and involvement in a physical or sexual assault may rely on the detection of saliva on exhibits such as swabs, clothing or bedding from actions such as biting, saliva expectoration or oral intercourse [3,4]. Regardless of the means by which saliva becomes deposited at crime scenes or on exhibits, the practising forensic scientist is faced with one fundamental issue; the detection (or more specifically the localisation) of saliva.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%