2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.rasd.2011.07.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oral language impairments in developmental disorders characterized by language strengths: A comparison of Asperger syndrome and nonverbal learning disabilities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 118 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These outcomes may highlight the role of higher language capacities as a protective factor in explaining better processing of social information in these children with ASD or SLD. Prior studies suggested that children with ASD and SLD demonstrated difficulties in oral language pragmatic skills, such as conversational turn-taking, maintaining topics, politeness, prosody, and awareness of listeners’ responses (see Stothers & Cardy’s, 2012, review). Moreover, data from such studies also highlighted that weaknesses in structural language (e.g., morphology, syntax) may contribute to pragmatic impairments (Volden, Coolican, Garon, White, & Bryson, 2009) and also suggested possible overlap with semantic capacities as investigated here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These outcomes may highlight the role of higher language capacities as a protective factor in explaining better processing of social information in these children with ASD or SLD. Prior studies suggested that children with ASD and SLD demonstrated difficulties in oral language pragmatic skills, such as conversational turn-taking, maintaining topics, politeness, prosody, and awareness of listeners’ responses (see Stothers & Cardy’s, 2012, review). Moreover, data from such studies also highlighted that weaknesses in structural language (e.g., morphology, syntax) may contribute to pragmatic impairments (Volden, Coolican, Garon, White, & Bryson, 2009) and also suggested possible overlap with semantic capacities as investigated here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, prior comparative studies that examined semantic language capacities, especially with regard to figurative language, found that the ASD and SLD groups did not differ significantly from one another, but both performed lower than the TD group (e.g., Mashal & Kasirer, 2011; Qualls et al, 2004; Stothers & Cardy, 2012). Others studies (e.g., Qualls et al, 2004; Stothers & Cardy, 2012) supported a common semantic profile for both ASD and SLD, pinpointing a strong vocabulary breadth but with limited depth and organization as well as problems in higher order semantic organization (e.g., awareness of words’ multiple meanings and uses, knowing how to use language in context) that may be closely linked with children’s pragmatic deficit. Altogether, for both clinical groups, the literature has shown a close link between language deficits (mainly semantic) and communicative-pragmatic capacities.…”
Section: Language Capacities In Asd Sld and Tdmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…NLD is a learning disorder and its main symptoms are centered in alterations that are generally attributed to the right hemisphere: spatial orientation, visual-perception, spatial structuring, fine psychomotor activity and pragmatic aspects of language [22]. The…”
Section: Nld and The Asperger Syndromementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite being considered as having good general vocabulary and being advanced in their lexical knowledge (Stothers & Cardy, 2012), individuals with AS present major difficulties on a communicational level. One of the most visible is the incapability of modifying language in accordance with social circumstances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%