Oral lichenoid lesions related to contact with dental materials: A literature review

Mj, Cobos-Fuentes; Martínez-Sahuquillo-Márquez, Angel; Gallardo, Isabel; Armas-Padrón,; Moreno-Fernández, Ana-María; Bullón-Fernández, Pedro

doi:10.4317/medoral.14.e514

Cited by 31 publications

(42 citation statements)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The diagnosis of OLRs is based on their clinical characteristics and the histological findings (9,15). However, the sensitivity and specificity of histological diagnosis are very low (4).…”

Section: Diagnosismentioning

confidence: 99%

Drug-induced oral lichenoid reactions. A literature review

Sanchez¹,

Sebastián²,

Soriano³

et al. 2010

J Clin Exp Dent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The terms oral lichenoid reactions or oral lichenoid lesions refer to lesions histologically and clinically similar to oral lichen planus, though with the particularity that in these cases the underlying cause is identifiable. In addition, these lesions are described according to the causal factor involved, including alterations resulting from direct contact with dental restoration materials, drug-related lesions, and lesions associated to graft-versus-host disease. Drug-induced oral lichenoid reactions or oral lichenoid lesions were first cited in 1971 by Almeyda and Levantine. Since then, many drug substances have been associated with such lesions. The most common agents are nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors. Key words: Oral lichenoid reactions, oral lichenoid lesions, drugs, medicines, drug-induced oral lesions.Serrano-Sánchez P, Bagán JV, Jiménez-Soriano, Sarrión G. Druginduced oral lichenoid reactions. A literature review. J Clin Exp Dent. 2010;2(2):e71-5.

show abstract

“…The diagnosis of OLRs is based on their clinical characteristics and the histological findings (9,15). However, the sensitivity and specificity of histological diagnosis are very low (4).…”

Section: Diagnosismentioning

confidence: 99%

Drug-induced oral lichenoid reactions. A literature review

Sanchez¹,

Sebastián²,

Soriano³

et al. 2010

J Clin Exp Dent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The etiology of OLL is usually identifiable: in case of topographically related lesions to amalgam fillings, intake of particular drugs, history of chronic graft versus host disease (cGvHD), or systemic diseases [4, 15]. OLL is also considered as potentially malignant disorder [4], although it is still unclear whether its malignant potential differs from OLP [16].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Clinicopathologic Correlation of Oral Lichen Planus and Oral Lichenoid Lesions: A Preliminary Study

Stipetić

Brzak

Bakale-Hodak

et al. 2014

The Scientific World Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Oral lichen planus (OLP) and oral lichenoid lesions (OLL) are clinically and histologically similar lesions but their treatment planning and prognosis are different. The review of the literature indicates numerous criteria to distinguish these two lesions; however there is a lot of inconsistency. Thus, the aim of this study was to determine the correlation of histopathology and clinical OLP and OLL diagnosis and to clarify which histopathologic criteria could best distinguish these two diagnoses. A retrospective study showed that clinically diagnosed 92 OLPs and 14 OLLs have been confirmed histopathologically in 52.2% and 42.9% of cases, respectively. In addition, histopathology showed statistically significant more eosinophils (P < 0.0005), plasma cells (P < 0.0005), and granulocytes (P < 0.05) in OLL than OLP. To establish histopathological diagnosis of OLP and OLL it should be mandatory to define the type of cells in mononuclear infiltrate, which can be associated more accurately with clinical feature and patient history. Therefore, currently accepted diagnostic criteria for OLP and OLL should be modified and validated on a larger number of patients taking into account particular distinguishing histopathological features.

show abstract

“…Bu nedenle Şahin ve ark. Oral likenoid lezyonu olan hastalardaki dental yama testi sonuçları dental restorasyon materyali ile direkt temas eden lezyon varlığında klinik şüphe varsa dental materyalin veya dolgunun değiştirilmesi önerilen bir yaklaşımdır 18,19 . Çalışmamızda 18 hastada yama testlerinde herhangi bir pozitif reaksiyon saptanmadı.…”

Section: Discussionunclassified

Evaluation of patients with oral lichenoid lesions by dental patch testing and results of removal of the dental restoration material

Sahin¹,

Çetinözman²,

Avcu³

et al. 2016

TURKDERM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and Design: Oral lichenoid lesions (OLL) are contact stomatitis characterized by white reticular or erosive patches, plaque-like lesions that are clinically and histopathologically indistinguishable from oral lichen planus (OLP). Amalgam dental fillings and dental restoration materials are among the etiologic agents. In the present study, it was aimed to evaluate the standard and dental series patch tests in patients with OLL in comparison to a control group and evaluate our results. Materials and Methods: Thirty-three patients with OLL or OLP and 30 healthy control subjects, who had at least one dental restoration material and/or dental filling, were included in the study. Both groups received standard series and dental patch test and the results were evaluated simultaneously.

show abstract

Oral lichenoid lesions related to contact with dental materials: A literature review

Cited by 31 publications

References 28 publications

Drug-induced oral lichenoid reactions. A literature review

Drug-induced oral lichenoid reactions. A literature review

Clinicopathologic Correlation of Oral Lichen Planus and Oral Lichenoid Lesions: A Preliminary Study

Evaluation of patients with oral lichenoid lesions by dental patch testing and results of removal of the dental restoration material

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About