2009
DOI: 10.1155/2009/274380
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oral Midazolam Premedication for Children Undergoing General Anaesthesia for Dental Care

Abstract: Objectives. To assess the efficacy and safety of injectable midazolam administered orally in 3 different doses in children undergoing complete dental rehabilitation under GA. Subjects and Methods. 60 children aged 2–6 years were enrolled in the study. The children were randomly assigned to one of 3 groups and received orally 0.5, 0.75, or 1.0 mg/kg of injectable midazolam mixed with apple juice 30 minutes before separation from parents. The following measurements were assessed: patient's acceptance of the medi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

3
46
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…and the patients discharged earlier from the hospital [at 15 min 77.8% of the patients in group o were discharged vs. 46.7% in group N]. This does not meet the results in the study done by Verma et al [16] On comparing the effect of oral and nasal midazolam, they stated that the recovery times [11.63 ± 4.19 minutes in nasal group vs. 25.20 ± 9.36 minutes in the oral group], and post-anesthesia recovery scores were better in the nasal spray group and this was same in the clinical study done by Sheta and AlSarheed [14] where they used oral midazolam as a premedication for dental care, The delay in the nasal route in our study could be attributed to the addition of ketamine in the nasal group…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…and the patients discharged earlier from the hospital [at 15 min 77.8% of the patients in group o were discharged vs. 46.7% in group N]. This does not meet the results in the study done by Verma et al [16] On comparing the effect of oral and nasal midazolam, they stated that the recovery times [11.63 ± 4.19 minutes in nasal group vs. 25.20 ± 9.36 minutes in the oral group], and post-anesthesia recovery scores were better in the nasal spray group and this was same in the clinical study done by Sheta and AlSarheed [14] where they used oral midazolam as a premedication for dental care, The delay in the nasal route in our study could be attributed to the addition of ketamine in the nasal group…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…In a study bySheta and Al Sarheed [14] apple syrup was used as a carrier. Mishra et al [17] mixed IV midazolam with honey [5 times the drug volume], which was well accepted by most of their subjects, in our study we have mixed midazolam with either flavoured paracetamol for oral preparation or with ketamine for nasal preparation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Midazolam and ketamine has been used extensively for pharmacological premedication, with adequate results. [2][3][4][5] Combination of oral midazolam with ketamine was used to get better results with lesser side effects. 6 Oral preparation has its own disadvantages like variable absorption, bioavailability, and being unpalatable, it is still better than needle pricks in children.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drugs of different classes like sedativeantianxiety drugs, opioids, anticholinergics, neuroleptics, H 2 blocker and antiemetics have been used for premedication. 3,4 Preoperative treatments also aims at reducing the emergence agitation occurring during recovery. 5 The comparison between the use of midazolam and diazepam as preoperative medication has been studied over different countries: USA, India, Iran and many other countries, midazolam found to provide pre operative sedative effect superior to that of diazepam.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%