2017
DOI: 10.4103/1119-3077.181396
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oral mucosa and lung cancer: Are genetic changes in the oral epithelium associated with lung cancer?

Abstract: A higher proportion of individuals with lung cancer demonstrate genetic damage to oral mucosa compared to those without cancer.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite has been huge described scientific progress in oncology, cancer therapy is still hindered by the absence of reliable early diagnosis methods (Missel et al, 2015;Fitch, 2019;Behrend et al, 2003). Over the last decade, considerable progress has been achieved in cancer screening using different kinds of markers, such as genetic and epigenetic changes in nuclear DNA (Komerik et al, 2017) and quantitative changes in circulating RNAs (Di et al, 2019). However, these screening methods have certain disadvantages, such as invasiveness, high cost, and difficulties in the result interpretation related to the complexity of nuclear genome (Yu, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite has been huge described scientific progress in oncology, cancer therapy is still hindered by the absence of reliable early diagnosis methods (Missel et al, 2015;Fitch, 2019;Behrend et al, 2003). Over the last decade, considerable progress has been achieved in cancer screening using different kinds of markers, such as genetic and epigenetic changes in nuclear DNA (Komerik et al, 2017) and quantitative changes in circulating RNAs (Di et al, 2019). However, these screening methods have certain disadvantages, such as invasiveness, high cost, and difficulties in the result interpretation related to the complexity of nuclear genome (Yu, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%