2006
DOI: 10.1096/fasebj.20.4.a811-c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oral N‐acetylcysteine supplementation does not improve cycling time trial performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite NAC acting to preserve gross efficiency during cycling, and possibly having an effect on performance during submaximal exercise, there appeared to be no effect of NAC supplementation on 1-km TT performance in WomenNC and WomenOC and thus, the data does not fully support our hypothesis. This null finding agrees with some studies conducted in men (Edwards et al 2006 ; Medved et al 2003 ), but not all, whereby several studies have found oral NAC supplementation to have ergogenic effects on performance (Cobley et al 2011 ; Paschalis et al 2018 ; Rhodes et al 2019 ; Slattery et al 2014 ), particularly in individuals with a glutathione deficiency (Paschalis et al 2018 ). NAC has been reported to improve repeat sprint cycling performance (Slattery et al 2014 ), performance of a repeated high-intensity intermittent shuttle (running) test (Cobley et al 2011 ), maximum shuttle (running) sprint time (Rhodes et al 2019 ) and cycling TT, Wingate and O 2 peak (Paschalis et al 2018 ).…”
Section: Nac and Performancesupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite NAC acting to preserve gross efficiency during cycling, and possibly having an effect on performance during submaximal exercise, there appeared to be no effect of NAC supplementation on 1-km TT performance in WomenNC and WomenOC and thus, the data does not fully support our hypothesis. This null finding agrees with some studies conducted in men (Edwards et al 2006 ; Medved et al 2003 ), but not all, whereby several studies have found oral NAC supplementation to have ergogenic effects on performance (Cobley et al 2011 ; Paschalis et al 2018 ; Rhodes et al 2019 ; Slattery et al 2014 ), particularly in individuals with a glutathione deficiency (Paschalis et al 2018 ). NAC has been reported to improve repeat sprint cycling performance (Slattery et al 2014 ), performance of a repeated high-intensity intermittent shuttle (running) test (Cobley et al 2011 ), maximum shuttle (running) sprint time (Rhodes et al 2019 ) and cycling TT, Wingate and O 2 peak (Paschalis et al 2018 ).…”
Section: Nac and Performancesupporting
confidence: 87%
“…NAC has been reported to improve repeat sprint cycling performance (Slattery et al 2014 ), performance of a repeated high-intensity intermittent shuttle (running) test (Cobley et al 2011 ), maximum shuttle (running) sprint time (Rhodes et al 2019 ) and cycling TT, Wingate and O 2 peak (Paschalis et al 2018 ). Whereas, cycling TT performance (Edwards et al 2006 ; Trewin et al 2013 ), and high intensity cycling efforts (Medved et al 2003 ) were not influenced by NAC supplementation. Since NAC is reported to be more effective in individuals with a glutathione deficiency, the incongruent findings may be related to baseline glutathione concentrations in the study participants (Paschalis et al 2018 ).…”
Section: Nac and Performancementioning
confidence: 97%