“…The methods most often used in the investigator's assessment were: i) scoring systems and ii) scales (12-14, 16, 17, 20-23, 25-29, 34). In addition, patients' status was assessed through i) subjective clinical evaluation (12,33), ii) objective clinical tests and measurements (18,24), iii) medication adjustment needs (21), iv) visual analogue scale (VAS) (17,26,34), v) force plate analysis (19,20), vi) activity monitor (AM) counts (34) and vii) time periods, such as disease-free interval (DFI) (15) and survival time (ST) (15,23). Regarding the owners' evaluation, questionnaires were carried out to obtain information on the severity of clinical signs (13, 17, 19-22, 27, 34), their overall opinion on the treatment response (12,13,30,31) and quality of life (34), as well as their perception of the clinical condition (29), behavior (32) and activity of their pets (32).…”