2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2021.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oral peptide delivery: challenges and the way ahead

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 187 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Increasing the absorption window of a drug by targeting the colon offers advantages in terms of frequency of dosing, where controlled or extended release (XR) formulations can be used to enable once daily dosing (improving patient convenience [ 8 ], maintaining therapeutic concentrations [ 13 ] and reducing the risk of administration errors [ 14 ]). The low proteolytic activity and the potential of intact peptide absorption [ 15 ] (as demonstrated for insulin [ 16 ] or linaclotide [ 17 ]) enables the large intestine (with emphasis on the proximal colon) as an appropriate absorption site [ 5 , 18 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasing the absorption window of a drug by targeting the colon offers advantages in terms of frequency of dosing, where controlled or extended release (XR) formulations can be used to enable once daily dosing (improving patient convenience [ 8 ], maintaining therapeutic concentrations [ 13 ] and reducing the risk of administration errors [ 14 ]). The low proteolytic activity and the potential of intact peptide absorption [ 15 ] (as demonstrated for insulin [ 16 ] or linaclotide [ 17 ]) enables the large intestine (with emphasis on the proximal colon) as an appropriate absorption site [ 5 , 18 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite such low oral bioavailability, both oral formulations are effective due to their high potency and the structural modifications that increase their half-life (t 1/2 ). Other strategies for oral peptide delivery include micro and nanoparticle carries for protection and controlled release, enzyme inhibitors to prevent degradation, and microneedle-based devices to bypass the intestinal epithelium, reviewed in [ 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The route of administration is one of the critical factors that govern the formulation of a bioactive. For oral peptide delivery, intestinal permeation, luminal, brush border and cytosolic metabolism, and hepatic clearance mechanism, are all typical limiting factors for poor bioavailability [ 45 , 46 ]. It has previously been reported that IPP and LKP are stable in low pH, intestinal and liver peptidase, indicating their ability to withstand first pass metabolism [ 13 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%