2013
DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2013-303951
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oral propranolol versus placebo for retinopathy of prematurity: a pilot, randomised, double-blind prospective study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
34
2
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
4
34
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Two clinical trials demonstrated that oral propranolol administered to preterm newborns with a precocious phase of ROP is effective in counteracting the progression of the disease (11,12) but not sufficiently safe. In fact, when propranolol was administered to newborns with very low gestational age and comorbidity (sepsis, surgical interventions requiring general anesthesia) the risk of severe adverse effects (primarily hypotension and bradycardia sometimes unresponsive to catecholamines) was too high, even when dosage was reduced from Articles the initial dose of 2 mg/kg/d to 1 mg/kg/d (11).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Two clinical trials demonstrated that oral propranolol administered to preterm newborns with a precocious phase of ROP is effective in counteracting the progression of the disease (11,12) but not sufficiently safe. In fact, when propranolol was administered to newborns with very low gestational age and comorbidity (sepsis, surgical interventions requiring general anesthesia) the risk of severe adverse effects (primarily hypotension and bradycardia sometimes unresponsive to catecholamines) was too high, even when dosage was reduced from Articles the initial dose of 2 mg/kg/d to 1 mg/kg/d (11).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following these observations, two independent prospective pilot trials have demonstrated that oral propranolol administered to preterm newborns suffering from a precocious phase of ROP is effective in counteracting the progression of the disease (11,12), even though not sufficiently safe (11). The ability of propranolol to cross the cornea and reach the periocular tissues in rabbits (13) or the retina of Padrini et al…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bicenter trial (NCT01238471) carried out in Haifa and Jerusalem, Israel [18] , randomized 20 infants with a gestational age of 24-28 weeks at birth with stage 2 or more ROP (zone II) or stage 1 ROP (zone I) to oral propranolol (starting dose: 0.5 mg/kg/day, divided in 3 doses, incrementally increased to 1.5 mg/kg/day) or placebo until hospital discharge, full retinal vascularization, or ROP intervention by laser treatment or bevacizumab injection (on average 16 ± 7 days). The short study report does not provide sufficient methodological details to reliably assess the risk of bias.…”
Section: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trials With Published Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…who.int/trialsearch/) that collects updated trial registration data sets provided by national or supranational registries and the US National Library of Medicine (http:// www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed) using the terms 'propranolol' and 'retinopathy of prematurity' in October 2014, and identified two completed randomized controlled trials that have published results [18,19] as well as two ongoing trials.…”
Section: Oral Propranolol In Infants With Rop: Randomized Controlled mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, recent studies have demonstrated that angiogenesis can be controlled by the adrenergic system through its regulation of pro-angiogenic factors [200,201]. Two small pilot, randomized controlled trials investigating oral proponalol (β-adrenergic inhibitor) in preterm infants with ROP, have shown a non-significant reduction of ROP requiring intervention by laser treatment or bevacizumab injection of similar magnitude [202,203]. However, large interventional studies are needed to determine the clinical benefit-risk ratio, since the administration of β-AR inhibitors might be associated with serious adverse effects (e.g.…”
Section: Biochemical and Molecular Pathwaysmentioning
confidence: 99%