2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.nrleng.2012.07.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oral reading fluency analysis in patients with Alzheimer disease and asymptomatic control subjects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
14
1
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
4
14
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, they found that AD patients produce longer turns with more words and a higher speech rate; this contrasts with our results, in which AD patients produce fewer words than non-AD patients, with lower speech rates. We note that our findings align better with other research (Martínez-Sánchez et al, 2013;Kavé and Dassa, 2018;Pistono et al, 2019a;Themistocleous et al, 2020). Mirheidari et al (2019) went a step further, combining CA-inspired interaction features including turntaking behavior with some acoustic and language features, to achieve a classification accuracy of 90% similar to this study.…”
Section: Classification Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Interestingly, they found that AD patients produce longer turns with more words and a higher speech rate; this contrasts with our results, in which AD patients produce fewer words than non-AD patients, with lower speech rates. We note that our findings align better with other research (Martínez-Sánchez et al, 2013;Kavé and Dassa, 2018;Pistono et al, 2019a;Themistocleous et al, 2020). Mirheidari et al (2019) went a step further, combining CA-inspired interaction features including turntaking behavior with some acoustic and language features, to achieve a classification accuracy of 90% similar to this study.…”
Section: Classification Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…70Hz) [9]; (6) Standard deviation of the third formant (F3), which refers to tones between 1.5kHz and 2.5kHz; (7) Speech rate, i.e. the number of syllables divided by the total speech time [16]; (8) Mean duration of the syllables [16]; (9) Mean duration of the inter-syllabic pauses >250ms [16]; (10) Percentage of the phonation time, i.e. the intra-and intersyllabic nuclei time <250ms compared to the total speech time [16]; (1))Articulation rate, i.e.…”
Section: B Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the intra-and intersyllabic nuclei time <250ms compared to the total speech time [16]; (1))Articulation rate, i.e. number of syllables divided by the phonation time without pauses [16].…”
Section: B Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AD patients represent the degree of deficits in specific cognitive constructs: neurophysiologic change following the progression of AD (e.g., presence of amyloid plaques, neurofibrillary tangles, and diffuse degeneration and atrophy of various parts of the cortex) can lead to changes in sensory perception and motor symptoms, resulting in impairment of spontaneous speech [17][18][19]. A stream of evidence has shown that AD patients are more likely to speak more slowly and with longer pauses, and spend more time finding the correct word, resulting in broken messages and lack of speech fluency [20][21][22]. These indicate the possibility of further developing further accurate prediction models using vocal features to identify AD risk [23,24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%