1979
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.1979.tb01506.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oral recognition of forms and oral muscular coordination ability. A longitudinal study in young adults

Abstract: A study has been carried out to investigate the constancy of results in oral recognition of forms (RF-test) and in tests which demand a fine coordination of the oral muscular apparatus (MA-test). Twenty examinees with a mean age of 22.5 years were tested with both test forms in 1972 and retested 4 years later in 1976. The performances in the RF- as well as in the MA-test improved considerably. As to the learning (training) effect in both test forms, the test results acquired by training during the previous per… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[28] In general, individuals performing well before the operation continued to do so later, corroborating previous longitudinal observations in a young adult population. [43] Learning effects have been reported in subjects non-subjected to glossectomy[4344] that was not observed in the population under investigation. This finding could possibly be related to the fact that more patients wore fixed orthodontic appliances after surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[28] In general, individuals performing well before the operation continued to do so later, corroborating previous longitudinal observations in a young adult population. [43] Learning effects have been reported in subjects non-subjected to glossectomy[4344] that was not observed in the population under investigation. This finding could possibly be related to the fact that more patients wore fixed orthodontic appliances after surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time spent on the sample collection and the percentage of errors was considered as the criteria for evaluation [7]. According to the results of the MA-test, the duration of the collection and the percentage of errors in the elderly and people of senile age were significantly higher; and the ability to study was lower than that in young people [3,8,16,17].…”
Section: Problem Statement and Analysis Of The Latest Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%