2016
DOI: 10.1177/1076029616677800
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oral Rivaroxaban for the Treatment of Symptomatic Venous Thromboembolism in 400 Patients With Active Cancer: A Single-Center Experience

Abstract: Rivaroxaban can be an attractive alternative for the treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…15 Nonetheless, several noncontrolled prospective and retrospective cohort studies provided further support for DOACs as attractive alternatives to LMWHs in terms of efficacy and safety clinical outcomes in CT patients. 16 17 18 19 20…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 Nonetheless, several noncontrolled prospective and retrospective cohort studies provided further support for DOACs as attractive alternatives to LMWHs in terms of efficacy and safety clinical outcomes in CT patients. 16 17 18 19 20…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inclusion and exclusion of citations/articles identified through the systematic literature search are illustrated in Figure . A total of six studies evaluating rivaroxaban for the treatment of CAT and published between 2016 and 2017 were included in the analysis (Table ) . Of the six studies, three were prospective (one multicenter) and three were retrospective (one used administrative claims data).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of six studies evaluating rivaroxaban for the treatment of CAT and published between 2016 and 2017 were included in the analysis (Table 1). [16][17][18][19][20][21] Of the six studies, three were prospective (one multicenter) and three were retrospective (one used administrative claims data). Individual study sample sizes ranged from 41 to 949 patients.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite this, the potential of the direct oral anticoagulants for CAT treatment was self-evident. Large, but uncontrolled and single centre series describing the successful use of direct oral anticoagulants for CAT treatment have started to become available [42,43]. A meta-analysis of the large, direct oral anticoagulant trials considering only included cancer patients (n=1132) indicated that the direct oral anticoagulants were at least as safe and effective as the conventional treatment for VTE in cancer patients [44].…”
Section: Direct Oral Anticoagulantsmentioning
confidence: 99%