Oral Sciences PhD Program Enrollment, Graduates, and Placement: 1994 to 2016

Abstract

For decades, dental schools in the United States have endured a significant faculty shortage. Studies have determined that the top 2 sources of dental faculty are advanced education programs and private practice. Those who have completed both DDS and PhD training are considered prime candidates for dental faculty positions. However, there is no national database to track those trainees and no evidence to indicate that they entered academia upon graduation. The objective of this study was to assess outcomes of dental school-affiliated oral sciences PhD program enrollment, graduates, and placement between 1994 and 2016. Using the American Dental Association annual survey of advanced dental education programs not accredited by the Commission on Dental Accreditation and data obtained from 22 oral sciences PhD programs, we assessed student demographics, enrollment, graduation, and placement. Based on the data provided by program directors, the average new enrollment was 33, and graduation was 26 per year. A total of 605 graduated; 39 did not complete; and 168 were still in training. Among those 605 graduates, 211 were faculty in U.S. academic institutions, and 77 were faculty in foreign institutions. Given that vacant budgeted full-time faculty positions averaged 257 per year during this period, graduates from those oral sciences PhD programs who entered academia in the United States would have filled 9 (3.6%) vacant faculty positions per year. Therefore, PhD programs have consistently generated only a small pipeline of dental school faculty. Better mentoring to retain talent in academia is necessary. Stronger support and creative funding plans are essential to sustain the PhD program. Furthermore, the oral sciences PhD program database should be established and maintained by dental professional organizations to allow assessments of training models, trends of enrollment, graduation, and placement outcomes.

Global overview on current paediatric dentistry teaching: A survey of National Member Societies of the IAPD

“…Well‐trained academicians are necessary, not only to fulfil the teaching requirements in dental schools but also to lead high‐quality research to generate evidence for the provision of better prevention and treatment of oral diseases in children. Reformation in curricula starting at the undergraduate and continuing to the postgraduate level, mentoring and appropriate guiding, together with financial support and access to PhD programs, may be of paramount importance for increasing interest in academic careers 27,28 …”

A University-based Survey of Career Choices and Perspectives on Higher Education among Dental Students in United Arab Emirates.

“…Most of the survey respondents (64%) felt that Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) program should be offered by medical universities in the UAE. PhD program in dentistry opens up avenues in teaching and research sectors of dentistry both within the country and at international level [23].…”

Translating Science into Improved Health for All

“…Highlighted in NIDCR’s Oral Health in America report is the need for an oral health research workforce that is well trained for the scientific rigors needed to move our profession forward in the goal of improving human health. The expansion of dental schools and increases in enrollments over the past 20 y sadly have not been met with an expansion of the scientific workforce (D’Souza and Colombo 2017; D’Souza et al 2017; Herzog et al 2018). This is a disturbing trend that does not bode well for the responsibility we have as a profession to advance knowledge.…”