2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2007.03.102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oral Tacrolimus Bioavailability Is Increased After Right Split Liver Transplantation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although a total of 12 patients per treatment arm were deemed sufficient for this analysis, the study population was smaller than previous studies of the PKs of tacrolimus. It has previously been shown that tacrolimus bioavailability was significantly higher after partial liver transplant compared with full transplants, and the volume of the split liver should be used to calculate the more appropriate dose of tacrolimus . However, this study did not examine the effects of split liver grafts on the PKs of tacrolimus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Although a total of 12 patients per treatment arm were deemed sufficient for this analysis, the study population was smaller than previous studies of the PKs of tacrolimus. It has previously been shown that tacrolimus bioavailability was significantly higher after partial liver transplant compared with full transplants, and the volume of the split liver should be used to calculate the more appropriate dose of tacrolimus . However, this study did not examine the effects of split liver grafts on the PKs of tacrolimus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This is clearly a predominantly paediatric problem given that split grafts are frequently used whether from deceased or living donors, and that the donor/recipient weight ratio varies with each donor/recipient pair. In addition, issues with diet and absorption is probably a major confounder, something which is difficult to control for and model [31][32][33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%