2006
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdl942
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oral vinorelbine plus capecitabine (oral vincap) combination in patients with advanced breast cancer (ABC). A phase II study of the GOIM (Gruppo Oncologico dell'Italia Meridionale)

Abstract: The oral vincap should be considered as an alternative to single agent capecitabine or vinorelbine in ABC refractory to antra-taxane combination.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
16
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
16
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In one study, the combination of oral UFT/leucovorin plusIVvinorelbinewasevaluatedin23advancedbreastcan-cerpatients.Atotalresponserateof22.2%with1complete responsewasobtained.Theregimenwasusedassecond-line treatment; however, neither data regarding anthracycline andtaxaneresistancenorsurvivaldatawerereportedinthis paper [5].Ourresponserateseemedtobeinferiorcompared tothisstudy,butallourpatientswereanthracycline-andtaxane-refractorywhichisunknownfortheotherstudy [5].Ina secondstudy,37metastaticbreastcancerpatientspreviously treatedwithanthracyclinesandtaxanesreceivedIVvinorelbine 30 mg/m 2 on day 1 and UFT 250 mg/m 2 daily, every 2weeks.Atotalof36%ofpatientsachievedPRand19%had SDwithatotal55%diseasecontrol.Mediantimetoprogressionwas18weeks [27].Whiletotaldiseasecontrolandmedian time to progression were similar to our study, the objective responseratewashigherthanwhatweobtainedinourstudy, whichcanonlybeexplainedbydifferencesbetweenthetwo protocols. In a third study, the combination of oral vinorelbineandcapecitabinewasinvestigatedin38metastaticbreast cancerpatientsrefractorytoanthracyclinesandtaxanes,and a39.4%responseratewasreportedwithafavorabletoxicity profile.Themediantimetoprogressionwas4.5monthsand median OS was 10 months [4]. However, in contrast to our studywhereallpatientshadvisceralmetastasis,dominantsites ofdiseasewerebonein26.3%andsofttissuein23.6%ofthe patients.Thismaybeanothercauseoftheinferiorresultsof ourstudycomparedtothisstudy,otherthanusageofdifferent oralfluoropyrimidinesinthetwostudies [4].Inanotherstudy, 52patientswithlocallyadvancedormetastaticbreastcancer were treated with vinorelbine (25 mg/m 2 IV days 1 and 8) plus oral capecitabine (1,000 mg/m 2 twice daily days 1-14) every21days.Allpatientshadreceivedpriortreatmentwith an anthracycline but only 11 (21%) had also received prior taxane.40%ofpatientsachievedCRorPRand2hadstable disease [28].Inarecentstudy,activityoforalvinorelbineand capecitabine was investigated in 25 elderly metastatic breast cancerpatients.Thetreatmentschedulewas60mg/m 2 oforal vinorelbine on days 1 and 8 and capecitabine 1,000 mg/m 2 twicedailydays1-14every3weeks.Inthisstudy,8patients received the combination as first-line, 5 patients as secondline,and12patients>third-line;nodataisavailableregarding taxaneresistance.Outof23evaluablepatients,6(26%)had objectiveresponse:2CRand4PR [29].Inthelast2studies mentioned [28,29],averylownumberofpatientshadpreviously used taxanes.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In one study, the combination of oral UFT/leucovorin plusIVvinorelbinewasevaluatedin23advancedbreastcan-cerpatients.Atotalresponserateof22.2%with1complete responsewasobtained.Theregimenwasusedassecond-line treatment; however, neither data regarding anthracycline andtaxaneresistancenorsurvivaldatawerereportedinthis paper [5].Ourresponserateseemedtobeinferiorcompared tothisstudy,butallourpatientswereanthracycline-andtaxane-refractorywhichisunknownfortheotherstudy [5].Ina secondstudy,37metastaticbreastcancerpatientspreviously treatedwithanthracyclinesandtaxanesreceivedIVvinorelbine 30 mg/m 2 on day 1 and UFT 250 mg/m 2 daily, every 2weeks.Atotalof36%ofpatientsachievedPRand19%had SDwithatotal55%diseasecontrol.Mediantimetoprogressionwas18weeks [27].Whiletotaldiseasecontrolandmedian time to progression were similar to our study, the objective responseratewashigherthanwhatweobtainedinourstudy, whichcanonlybeexplainedbydifferencesbetweenthetwo protocols. In a third study, the combination of oral vinorelbineandcapecitabinewasinvestigatedin38metastaticbreast cancerpatientsrefractorytoanthracyclinesandtaxanes,and a39.4%responseratewasreportedwithafavorabletoxicity profile.Themediantimetoprogressionwas4.5monthsand median OS was 10 months [4]. However, in contrast to our studywhereallpatientshadvisceralmetastasis,dominantsites ofdiseasewerebonein26.3%andsofttissuein23.6%ofthe patients.Thismaybeanothercauseoftheinferiorresultsof ourstudycomparedtothisstudy,otherthanusageofdifferent oralfluoropyrimidinesinthetwostudies [4].Inanotherstudy, 52patientswithlocallyadvancedormetastaticbreastcancer were treated with vinorelbine (25 mg/m 2 IV days 1 and 8) plus oral capecitabine (1,000 mg/m 2 twice daily days 1-14) every21days.Allpatientshadreceivedpriortreatmentwith an anthracycline but only 11 (21%) had also received prior taxane.40%ofpatientsachievedCRorPRand2hadstable disease [28].Inarecentstudy,activityoforalvinorelbineand capecitabine was investigated in 25 elderly metastatic breast cancerpatients.Thetreatmentschedulewas60mg/m 2 oforal vinorelbine on days 1 and 8 and capecitabine 1,000 mg/m 2 twicedailydays1-14every3weeks.Inthisstudy,8patients received the combination as first-line, 5 patients as secondline,and12patients>third-line;nodataisavailableregarding taxaneresistance.Outof23evaluablepatients,6(26%)had objectiveresponse:2CRand4PR [29].Inthelast2studies mentioned [28,29],averylownumberofpatientshadpreviously used taxanes.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 91%
“…In a third study, the combination of oral vinorelbineandcapecitabinewasinvestigatedin38metastaticbreast cancerpatientsrefractorytoanthracyclinesandtaxanes,and a39.4%responseratewasreportedwithafavorabletoxicity profile.Themediantimetoprogressionwas4.5monthsand median OS was 10 months [4]. However, in contrast to our studywhereallpatientshadvisceralmetastasis,dominantsites ofdiseasewerebonein26.3%andsofttissuein23.6%ofthe patients.Thismaybeanothercauseoftheinferiorresultsof ourstudycomparedtothisstudy,otherthanusageofdifferent oralfluoropyrimidinesinthetwostudies [4].Inanotherstudy, 52patientswithlocallyadvancedormetastaticbreastcancer were treated with vinorelbine (25 mg/m 2 IV days 1 and 8) plus oral capecitabine (1,000 mg/m 2 twice daily days 1-14) every21days.Allpatientshadreceivedpriortreatmentwith an anthracycline but only 11 (21%) had also received prior taxane.40%ofpatientsachievedCRorPRand2hadstable disease [28].Inarecentstudy,activityoforalvinorelbineand capecitabine was investigated in 25 elderly metastatic breast cancerpatients.Thetreatmentschedulewas60mg/m 2 oforal vinorelbine on days 1 and 8 and capecitabine 1,000 mg/m 2 twicedailydays1-14every3weeks.Inthisstudy,8patients received the combination as first-line, 5 patients as secondline,and12patients>third-line;nodataisavailableregarding taxaneresistance.Outof23evaluablepatients,6(26%)had objectiveresponse:2CRand4PR [29].Inthelast2studies mentioned [28,29],averylownumberofpatientshadpreviously used taxanes. This might have caused better results in thesestudiescomparedtoourstudyinwhichallpatientswere taxane-refractory.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ongoing studies are investigating oral vinorelbine [37,38] , and an international trial investigating a lower dosage of capecitabine (825 vs. 1,000 mg/m 2 b.i.d.) is underway.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two phase I studies with an all-oral combination of vinorelbine and capecitabine recommended a dosage of capecitabine 2,000 mg/m 2 and vinorelbine 60 mg/m 2 [17,18]. Based upon those data, several phase II studies were initiated [19][20][21][22][23]. Here, we present the results of a prospective observational trial investigating the activity and safety of an all-oral combination chemotherapy of vinorelbine (Navelbine oral ® , Pierre Fabre Pharma, Freiburg, Germany) and capecitabine (Xeloda ® , Roche Pharma AG, Grenzach-Wyhlen, Germany) in HER2-negative, locally advanced, inoperable or metastatic breast cancer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%