2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.advnut.2023.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Orally Ingested Probiotic, Prebiotic, and Synbiotic Interventions as Countermeasures for Gastrointestinal Tract Infections in Nonelderly Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some study results showed mixed effects in terms of having benefits of using probiotics in reducing the risk of gastrointestinal infections (RR 0.86, 05% CI 0.73 to 1.101) but having no effects on the duration or severity of gastrointestinal infection. The authors cautioned use of the results due to a low number of studies, high risk of bias and heterogeneity in the studies [ 58 ]. The study results may be not comparable, partly because of differing outcome measures [ 58 ] and also not having results of a meta-analysis in all reported studies [ 56 , 57 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some study results showed mixed effects in terms of having benefits of using probiotics in reducing the risk of gastrointestinal infections (RR 0.86, 05% CI 0.73 to 1.101) but having no effects on the duration or severity of gastrointestinal infection. The authors cautioned use of the results due to a low number of studies, high risk of bias and heterogeneity in the studies [ 58 ]. The study results may be not comparable, partly because of differing outcome measures [ 58 ] and also not having results of a meta-analysis in all reported studies [ 56 , 57 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors cautioned use of the results due to a low number of studies, high risk of bias and heterogeneity in the studies [ 58 ]. The study results may be not comparable, partly because of differing outcome measures [ 58 ] and also not having results of a meta-analysis in all reported studies [ 56 , 57 ]. Further studies are suggested for understanding the effect of probiotics as a single therapy or in combination with standard treatments for Crohn’s disease and gastroenteritis due to other etiologies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One systematic review and meta-analysis found that Saccharomyces boulardii CNCM I-745 significantly decreased the incidence of traveler’s diarrhea [ 48 ]. A separate meta-analysis by Fagnant et al found that prebiotics and probiotics modestly reduced the risk of GI tract infection in adults; however, the study was limited by a high risk of bias and heterogeneous interventions and could not assess the effects of specific prebiotic or probiotic strains [ 49 ].…”
Section: Role Of Prebiotics and Probiotics For Various Gastrointestin...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29 In summary, the prebiotics showed a protective effect in these diseases, reducing inflammatory markers, increasing the production of SCFA, improving calcium absorption, improving immune and cognitive function, and increasing the abundance of Bifidobacterium, amongst other beneficial effects. 29 Other recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses evaluated the effect of prebiotic supplementation for diabetes, [109][110][111] intestinal infections, 112,113 respiratory infections, 114 thyroid function, 115,116 depression, 117,118 autism, 119,120 polycystic ovary syndrome, 121 and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). 122,123 V. Comparative analysis Age-dependent variations in the composition of gut microbiota 1.…”
Section: Impact Of Prebiotics On Gut Microbiota In Adultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses evaluated the effect of prebiotic supplementation for diabetes, 109–111 intestinal infections, 112,113 respiratory infections, 114 thyroid function, 115,116 depression, 117,118 autism, 119,120 polycystic ovary syndrome, 121 and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). 122,123…”
Section: Prebioticsmentioning
confidence: 99%