2021
DOI: 10.3934/dcds.2020372
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Orbital and asymptotic stability of a train of peakons for the Novikov equation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[8] on 𝑊 1,∞ and the orbital stability results of Refs. [7,29,30] on 𝐻 1 (ℝ). Per the discussion in the Introduction section, there is no easy relation between linear and orbital stability for peakon solutions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[8] on 𝑊 1,∞ and the orbital stability results of Refs. [7,29,30] on 𝐻 1 (ℝ). Per the discussion in the Introduction section, there is no easy relation between linear and orbital stability for peakon solutions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The unicity is a consequence of the unicity of the solution of the initial value problem (30). By the chain rule, we obtain…”
Section: Spectral and Linear Instability On 𝑳 𝟐 (ℝ)mentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The literature surrounding the Novikov equation is not yet quite as overwhelming as for the CH and DP equations, but there is no shortage of articles about PDE-analytic questions, in addition to the one just mentioned [253,290,305,176,147,314,306,135,150,195,315,196,307,53,304,143,34,149,328,302,63,228,278,207]. Stability of peakons has been considered by several researchers [215,299,257,258,54,55], and likewise solitons [237,206,260,259,301,229,326] and integrability aspects [281,30,186,29,273]. However, the numerical analysis community has not yet jumped on the bandwagon; we are only aware of two (rather similar) studies [57,58].…”
Section: The Novikov Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, it is easy to check that it can actually be sharpened to depend only on u0,x L ∞ . Here, since u0 ∈ Y+ we have u0,xL ∞ ≤ u0 L ∞ ≤ u0 H 1 .The interested reader can consult to[29] for a simplification of this proof without the sign assumption of the momentum density.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%