reassuring early outcome. In contrast, in the femoropopliteal artery mechanical stress is high, thus implanted stents are exposed to the risk of stent fracture and malformation, increasing the rate of restenosis. 8, 9 In the below-the-knee (BTK) region, use of metal, balloon-expandable drugeluting stents is more common than the self-expandable nitinol ones, because those stents are even more susceptible to fracture. Moreover, due to the characteristics of BTK lesions, in most cases multiple stents are needed. 10 Therefore, atherectomy (AT), which removes the atherosclerotic plaque from the arterial wall, appears to be promising. This expectancy is linked to the fact that these devices cut out the plaque from the artery wall, thus significantly increasing lumen diameter and removing potential sources of inflammation, thus facilitating satisfactory outcome. 11Thus far, the long-term outcomes after endovascular A ccording to recent clinical practice and evidence, endovascular revascularization of the lower limb arteries has superseded surgical procedures. 1,2 Regardless of advancement in endovascular technology, restenosis and the need for repeat revascularization are still challenging. Moreover, the mortality in peripheral artery disease (PAD), especially in critical limb ischemia (CLI), is high, fluctuating at around 20% at 6-month follow-up, and exceeding 50% within 5 years from diagnosis. 3,4 These numbers increase in patients with coexisting symptomatic coronary artery disease (CAD). Additionally, CLI is associated with poor quality of life 5 and high treatment costs. Background: The impact of endovascular revascularization of the lower extremity arteries with atherectomy (AT) compared with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) is still unclear. Therefore, the aim of the study was to compare long-term outcomes after percutaneous PTA and AT in patients requiring endovascular revascularization.