1995
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.51.13987
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Orbital polarization in metallicf-electron systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
48
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…al. [62] have found a similar result in their tight-binding and LDA+U calculations, observing that they would need to reduce U f to ∼ 2.7 eV to put the itinerant state lower.…”
Section: B Hartree Fock With Static Screeningmentioning
confidence: 48%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…al. [62] have found a similar result in their tight-binding and LDA+U calculations, observing that they would need to reduce U f to ∼ 2.7 eV to put the itinerant state lower.…”
Section: B Hartree Fock With Static Screeningmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…(5) to the LDFtotal energy functional. Apparently, a value of U f ∼ 3 eV, about half of what would be expected, is required to make the Ce transition occur in the right place [62]. This is interesting, since judging from the separations between the centers of gravity of the empty and occupied 4f states, SIC calculations for Ce [59] and Pr [65] both correspond to U f ∼ 9-10 eV.…”
Section: A Corrected Local Density Functional Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We believe that the higher bias features are an extension of the general idea developed here, which will be addressed in a future work. Let us now define the DQD Hamiltonian 17,19,20 in a localized orbital basis as…”
Section: A Electronic Structure Of a Double Quantum Dotmentioning
confidence: 99%