2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.12.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Orbitofrontal damage reduces auditory sensory response in humans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
13
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our univariate analyses revealed attentional differences at the sensory level but not higher cognitive level ERP component. Although the peak N1 amplitude in response to target tones was greater during on task compared to mind wandering states [33,36], we did not observe any attentional differences in the N1 and P3 in response to standard tones. In contrast, our machine learning analyses using ERP components in response to standard tones were successful at detecting mind wandering based on these features.…”
Section: Plos Onecontrasting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our univariate analyses revealed attentional differences at the sensory level but not higher cognitive level ERP component. Although the peak N1 amplitude in response to target tones was greater during on task compared to mind wandering states [33,36], we did not observe any attentional differences in the N1 and P3 in response to standard tones. In contrast, our machine learning analyses using ERP components in response to standard tones were successful at detecting mind wandering based on these features.…”
Section: Plos Onecontrasting
confidence: 84%
“…Given that scalp EEG is comparably low cost, and can be implemented outside of the laboratory, these EEG measures could be ideal for real-time detection of this phenomenon in the real world. In particular, the P1 and N1 ERP components in response to visual and auditory probes in a target detection task are reduced during mind wandering [ 33 , 35 , 36 ]. This indicates that sensory-evoked responses to both visual and auditory inputs were significantly attenuated, suggesting that mind wandering disrupts external perception regardless of sensory modality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In primates, the connections originate mostly from the upper layers of sensory association cortices and innervate mainly the middle OFC layers (3–5), in a feedforward manner [ 70 , 71 ]. In turn, the OFC can also modulate sensory processes, especially auditory processing [ 72 , 73 ], through feedback connections. Impairment in sensory processing and evaluation, often associated with ASD [ 74 , 75 ], involves disengagement of sensory cortices and neural circuits that process social reward, in which OFC has a central role [ 76 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to healthy subjects, we have previously shown that patients with lesion to the OFC show stronger than normal bias to voluntary attention supporting task performance but at the expense of involuntary attention allocation that might be beneficial outside the current task demands (Hartikainen et al, 2012a ; Mäki-Marttunen et al, 2017 ). In a recent study with OFC lesion patients, non-emotional auditory stimuli evoked reduced amplitude of N1 potential which is known to be modulated by top-down attention control (Kam et al, 2018 ). Other electrophysiological studies have reported altered attentional processing of emotion and novelty after OFC lesion, although with equivocal results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%