2017
DOI: 10.3847/1538-3881/aa8d6f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Orbits for 18 Visual Binaries and Two Double-line Spectroscopic Binaries Observed with HRCAM on the CTIO SOAR 4 m Telescope, Using a New Bayesian Orbit Code Based on Markov Chain Monte Carlo*

Abstract: We present orbital elements and mass sums for eighteen visual binary stars of spectral types B to K (five of which are new orbits) with periods ranging from 20 to more than 500 yr. For two doubleline spectroscopic binaries with no previous orbits, the individual component masses, using combined astrometric and radial velocity data, have a formal uncertainty of ∼ 0.1M . Adopting published photometry, and trigonometric parallaxes, plus our own measurements, we place these objects on an H-R diagram, and discuss t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
64
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
4
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Its use in the characterization of orbits of binary stars, however, has been more limited, despite the high degree of formal similarity between exoplanets and multiple stellar sysrtems. Some examples of works addressing the estimation of orbital parameters of binary stars from a Bayesian perspective (but only using complete datasets) are Sahlmann et al (2013); Burgasser et al (2015) and Mendez et al (2017).…”
Section: Mcmc For Multiple Imputationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Its use in the characterization of orbits of binary stars, however, has been more limited, despite the high degree of formal similarity between exoplanets and multiple stellar sysrtems. Some examples of works addressing the estimation of orbital parameters of binary stars from a Bayesian perspective (but only using complete datasets) are Sahlmann et al (2013); Burgasser et al (2015) and Mendez et al (2017).…”
Section: Mcmc For Multiple Imputationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approach described here is well-known within the astronomical literature, being Hartkopf et al (1989); Pourbaix (1994); Lucy (2014), and Mendez et al (2017) some examples of its use.…”
Section: Dynamics Of a Binary Starmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations