2018
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty2704
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Orbits of 14 binaries based on 2018 SOAR speckle observations

Abstract: All of them are placed below Dec. + 21 • and the majority are main-sequence stars. Except in cases with giant components or close triple systems, the ANAPAR method was used in order to obtain precise dynamical parallaxes and individual masses. These parallaxes were compared with those obtained by Gaia and/or Hipparcos satellites. In the case of FIN 305, we present two different orbital solutions. Also, using the dynamical parallaxes given by these orbits, we have been able to calculate the luminosity of these … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Three of them were the brown dwarfs WISE J053516.80-750024.9, WISE J035934.06-540154.6, and WISE J154214.00+223005.2, with published parallaxes of 250± 79 mas, 145 ± 39 mas (Marsh et al 2013), and 96 ± 41 mas (Tinney et al 2014), respectively, which now have higher-precision parallax measurements from Kirkpatrick et al (2021) that move them outside the 10 pc limit. The other two objects were also low-mass stars: LP 388-55, an M7.5 V + L0 binary that had its parallax re-estimated from 110.7±5.8 mas (Dittmann et al 2014) to 64.3 ± 0.7 mas in Gaia EDR3 and the binary G 19-15 had a dynamical parallax measured of 74.0 ± 0.99 mas from Docobo et al (2019).…”
Section: Catalogue Compilationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three of them were the brown dwarfs WISE J053516.80-750024.9, WISE J035934.06-540154.6, and WISE J154214.00+223005.2, with published parallaxes of 250± 79 mas, 145 ± 39 mas (Marsh et al 2013), and 96 ± 41 mas (Tinney et al 2014), respectively, which now have higher-precision parallax measurements from Kirkpatrick et al (2021) that move them outside the 10 pc limit. The other two objects were also low-mass stars: LP 388-55, an M7.5 V + L0 binary that had its parallax re-estimated from 110.7±5.8 mas (Dittmann et al 2014) to 64.3 ± 0.7 mas in Gaia EDR3 and the binary G 19-15 had a dynamical parallax measured of 74.0 ± 0.99 mas from Docobo et al (2019).…”
Section: Catalogue Compilationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of these (which include suspected binaries from Hipparcos and tight spectroscopic binariessee previous paragraph) we have been able to confirm, resolve, and measure 1,183 systems -many several times-(see e.g. Tokovinin et al (2015), Gomez et al (2016), Mendez et al (2017), Docobo et al (2019) and Tokovinin et al (2020)). Other notable results from our observations include the discovery of almost sixty inner or outer subsystems in previously known binaries, as well as two quadruple systems (Tokovinin et al 2015(Tokovinin et al , 2016.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Gaia vs Hipparcos: the Accuracy of Parallax Measurements Mashhoor A. Al-Wardat The mass sums estimated by our method are 3.16 M ⊙ using the Hipparcos-2 parallax measurements, far below the main sequence using the Gaia DR2 parallaxes (unacceptable solution), and 3.17 M ⊙ using the Gaia DR3 measurements. We also calculated the dynamical mass sum using the orbital period 𝑃 = 79.08 years and semi-major axis 𝑎 = 0.223 arcsec from Docobo et al [14] and the formula:…”
Section: Pos(muto2022)010mentioning
confidence: 99%