1965
DOI: 10.1090/s0002-9947-1965-0209866-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Orbits of 𝐿¹-functions under doubly stochastic transformations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
50
0
3

Year Published

1968
1968
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
50
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In view of Proposition 1.1, our Strong Approximation Theorem 2.2 is sharper than that of [2,8]. We now prove…”
Section: As Tf(x) = \P(x Dy)f(y)fel Oo and ^P(x A)/{dx) = /{A) Formentioning
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In view of Proposition 1.1, our Strong Approximation Theorem 2.2 is sharper than that of [2,8]. We now prove…”
Section: As Tf(x) = \P(x Dy)f(y)fel Oo and ^P(x A)/{dx) = /{A) Formentioning
confidence: 79%
“…For each TG^ there is a unique T^e^ such that By the weak (strong) topology in & we mean the weak (strong) operator topology in £^ [2,8]. We note that the relative uniform topology on Φ 1 coincides with the uniform topology on Φ x introduced by Halmos [5].…”
Section: As Tf(x) = \P(x Dy)f(y)fel Oo and ^P(x A)/{dx) = /{A) Formentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To be precise, let g : [0, 1] → R denote an arbitrary function on a given interval, say [0, 1], we define for t ∈Im(g) Note that this function is always increasing and coincides with the inverse of the function g , say g −1 , in the case where g is strictly increasing. Some properties of a related function have been discussed in the context of nondecreasing/nonincreasing rearrangements [see, e.g., Ryff (1965), Ryff (1970), and Bennett and Sharpley (1988) among others]. The function g −1 I is not necessarily smooth, but smoothing can easily be accomplished by considering the function…”
Section: A Strictly Monotone Regression Estimatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that Dette et al's (2005a) proof for the asymptotic distribution ofĥ defined in (1.1) and its inverse is not easily generalized to obtain asymptotic results about the estimator based on (1.2). The approach to use the inverseĥ −1 as an estimator for g, whereĥ is defined in (1.2) is related to nondecreasing rearrangements of data considered by Ryff (1965Ryff ( ,1970, and is in principle similar to Polonik's (1995Polonik's ( ,1998 work, who constructs estimators for a density f from the identity…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%